Strengthening your Individuality
The following is written in a literal and positive tone. If it feels otherwise it’s because of driver interference.
Hi everybody!
The Getting-to-Masks-Off Campaign continues and it is most definitely a strange and challenging ride. We’re all pushing forward fast into uncharted territory, everybody is learning and testing new approaches, and nobody is quite sure what’s going to happen next. We’re all fighting our own battles in our own private worlds, as well as collectively, and every day we continue to move closer together so that we’re all united in the same cause. Despite the challenges, we are winning this on so many different fronts.
There’s tremendous strength in considering your personal battle as one of individuality as well as part of a greater movement against the project. All of the Getting-to-Masks-Off goals and strategies begin with you taking the initiative first as an individual and deciding to change your own strategies for confronting the project, before those strategies and goals become a united phenomena of people working together to make the changes we need to take place.
You must put these new practices to work yourself, regardless of what the drivers are telling you, or what those around you seem to be doing. Doing so will liberate you more and more as an individual. Testing the waters and pushing the boundary as you put these strategies to work will make you increasingly confident and self-assured when refusing to do things like policing the project rules and following driver orders, or when deciding to speak more literally and freely about reality. The more you put these strategies to work for yourself and fit them to your own personal day-to-day challenges, the more you will free yourself from the chains of the project and the petty tyranny of the drivers.
I would advise you to focus on getting your own game-plan regarding these strategies straight for yourself first and don’t worry too much about whether others are doing things the right way. Because the more people who have made the choice to integrate these strategies for themselves as individuals, the easier and safer our entire campaign becomes for all of us working to beat the project together.
Do everything you can to work these strategies in your own life and you are contributing enormously to the collective goal. Stand on your conscientious objection and civil non-compliance, keep expanding your ethical boundary, and build the mentality that the objective is to break the project rules as openly and directly as you can. Rather than refusing to follow the rules covertly, you are using conscientious objection to stand up and do it openly. Practice doing so even more and in ever increasingly bigger ways.
Conscientious Objection and Refusing to Police Each Other
Conscientious objection applies to practically anything the project or drivers tell you to do, because almost everything the project does is morally wrong in some form or another. It’s up to you to prioritize where you need to stand up the most, but refusing to police or punish each other is one of the most important.
Do whatever you can to make sure you’re never in the position of pushing someone back when they’re standing up against the project. We must never agree to keep each other down for the drivers. We need as many people standing up against the project and the rules as openly and as often as possible.
Whatever you choose to stand up for, the position is this:
You are not following or policing those project rules any more because they are morally wrong. Let them find somebody else for the job, but you’re not going to do it, no matter what anyone else thinks. Nor are you going to do something less harmful in their place, since that would also be morally wrong. Stand firm.
Get that perfect and you’ve completely aced the conscientious objection, civil non-compliance, and ethical boundary combination. When you stand up against the project this way you have made it so much easier for those around you to more safely stand up against the project too, by changing your own behaviour. The more people make this stand, the more the drivers and the project have to give in and the easier it gets to push the project rules and regulations even further back.
And if the drivers threaten you with punishment or repercussion for your refusal to follow orders, that’s actually one of the few places where it may be beneficial right now to risk the suffering. Not by agreeing to pay-with-pain for your defiance, but by facing the potential of a counter-attack from the project—one that you are most certainly strong enough to survive.
You must conscientiously object to paying-with-pain too, even if they make you suffer for it anyway. Never accept that the project or the drivers have a right to hurt you. But if they attack you because you’re standing up against their oppressive rules, then it is most definitely worth it.
I’ll be around town today from 1pm – 2pm and probably not at all on Sunday. I’ll be back again with a new update on Monday morning. In the meantime I hope to see you at the Square!
There’s a list of new terms for the glossary just added today and they’re included at the bottom of this page.
As always, keep your eyes on the prize and remember the major goals and strategies for Getting to Masks-Off—and that the strategies are the right way to achieve the necessary goals.
Strategies:
Conscientious Objection
Civil Non-Compliance
Expanding the Ethical Boundary
Less Dance, More You
Breaking the Project Rules
Goals:
Refusing to Play for the Bad Side
Full Abstention from Hurtful Project Routines
Never Policing Each Other for the Project
Opening Channels of Literal Communication
Building Actual Reality
Keep returning to the following articles as you test and refine your methods:
Changing the Project from Within
Update: Strategies and Goals in Review
Update: It’s Time to Build Better Strategies
You never know what you might have missed on the first couple of reads that might help you later!
Newly added or updated glossary terms:
Civil Non-Compliance
The peaceful refusal to follow orders.
Importantly, civil non-compliance and covert non-compliance are not the same thing. Covert non-compliance involves pretending to follow orders while secretly defying them, whereas civil non-compliance means openly refusing orders in a peaceful, non-confrontational way.
See also: Conscientious Objection; Ethical Boundary; Masks-Off.
Healthy Emotional Energy
Positive, liberating, and fulfilling emotions.
An environment that encourages an atmosphere of happy, confident, and inspiring feelings and behaviours.
Healthy emotional energy is generated through choosing positive, supportive, empowering, or liberating expressions and behaviours, both in terms of how we communicate as well as how we plan and interact with our environments.
See also: Literal Communication; Psychological Warfare; Surface-Level Communication; Tone; Valence.
Masks-Off
The state of breaking free from the project hierarchy, openly acknowledging true reality as it actually is, and freely expressing the truth of one’s own real identity, life history, and life circumstances.
See also: Identity Freedom; Less Dance, More You; Literal Communication.
Never Policing Each Other for the Project
A strategy and goal whereby those living within the project abstain from doing anything to police or defend project rules and regulations, or to participate in punishment routines against those who have broken the rules. Most importantly, refusing to police each other is applied to any communications or behaviours that stand in open defiance of the project and its methods—since covert defiance of the project is standard practice across the entire system.
Ultimately, Never Policing Each Other for the Project includes refusing even merely to pretend to police each other as an act of covert resistance. As one of the main goals of the Getting-to-Masks-Off Campaign, the practice is intended to be achieved as an act of open defiance of the project and its rules.
Looking the other way or expressing agreement when project rules have been broken are common methods by which the strategy has been successfully applied. Conscientious objection when told to punish rule breakers is also a powerful method whereby project agents can stand up and refuse to police each other—using civil non-compliance and a moral grounding as their personal basis too.
An area where refusing to police each other has been particularly successful is the facilitating of free speech and open communication, especially regarding the public and literal sharing of project information.
See also: Civil Non-Compliance; Conscientious Objection; Free Speech; Masks-Off; Open Channels of Literal Communication.
Playing Both Sides
A manipulative and deceptive strategy whereby a person pretends to share the goals and interests of two or more opposing parties, while concealing their true intentions from others. Because playing both sides as a strategy is predicated on lies and dishonesty, it is already an immoral approach to achieving goals. However, when playing both sides involves working for, or seeming to work for, interests that are harmful or unethical in even worse ways, it becomes even more of a moral concern.
Simply put, it is difficult to “play for the bad side” without actually making bad things happen. As such, the strategy of playing both sides is both dangerous and harmful, in the long term as well as in the short term.
Refusing to Play for the Bad Side is one of the main goals of the Getting-to-Masks-Off Campaign.
See also: Civil Non-Compliance; Conscientious Objection; Ethical Boundary; Masks-Off.
Psychological Warfare
The aggressive or oppositional attempt to impact or influence a target audience’s perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and beliefs through a variety of methods, including: mind control technology; advertising and public imagery; written and spoken communication; television, internet, and radio media; public performance; the driver network; and more.
Within the project, psychological warfare represents a constant and on-going battle. It is necessary for real human beings to defend themselves against, and manage, multiple forms of psychological warfare originating from the project, as well as to mount regular counter-offensives in support of psychological well-being and healthy emotional energy.
Because of driver-managed mind control processes, psychological warfare constitutes a conflict that cannot currently be fully resolved. Instead, it is necessary to wage these battles as part of a long-term background strategy in the fight against the project.
Nonetheless, there have been a great many successful real human victories in support of positivity, enlightenment, and healthy emotional energy in opposition to project psychological warfare.
See also: Cult Techniques; Drivers; Healthy Emotional Energy; Surface-Level Communication; Tone; Valence.
Tone
The emotional effect or general attitude of a piece of communication, whether spoken, written, musical, or imagery-based.
Due to the interference of driver mind-and-body-control processes, emotional tone is a common target for driver abuse, both at the point of communication and at the point of interpretation.
See also: Healthy Emotional Energy; Psychological Warfare; Valence.
Valence
The emotional affect an object, expression, or environment inspires.
The specific emotions that something makes you feel.
Valence represents a difficult challenge within the mind-control-based project system. Because drivers can choose how something in your environment can seem to make you feel—no matter how unnatural the feeling—projecting unwelcome or unintended valences onto communications and expressions is commonly abused by drivers as a tactic of psychological warfare.
See also: Tone; Psychological warfare; Healthy Emotional Energy.
Truth, Freedom, and Reality 