Three New Strategies
The following is written in a generally positive and literal style. If it seems otherwise, it’s because of driver interference. Watch out for valence and tone!
Hi everybody!
Hope you’re all well today. I’ve added three new strategies to The Strategies of Overt Resistance this morning, Getting Out of Bad Deals to Choosing a Side, and Less Dance, More You and Less Circus, More Reality to Fighting for Reality. The new strategies are included here as well.
There’ll be more content over the next week, with sections added to Building the Right Behaviours on the way, so I’ll keep you posted.
Look after yourselves and stay strong!
Getting Out of Bad Deals
When you’ve chosen your side on a certain issue or moral position, you will have to openly communicate an honest and consistent identity in regards to those issues, in every context or interaction where they apply.
It will now be necessary to make efforts to exit any agreements, affiliations, or deals that no longer fit with your openly expressed true beliefs.
You will have to make fast and immediate efforts to part ways with any aspects of the project system that you can no longer represent, as well as any simulated entities or factions that stand in opposition to your true beliefs or moral positions.
Any deals or arrangements that you’ve agreed to that may have been based on terms and conditions that no longer live up to your publicly-stated beliefs and opinions will have to be terminated.
As long as those deals are based on immoral or antisocial conditions, you are well within your rights to cancel them, whether the agreed terms have been met or not!
Relying on conscientious objection, tactical negotiation, and a strong prosocial basis for your position will provide you with a concrete pathway to successfully voiding your bad deals, as well as ending unwanted affiliations with “bad side” elements within the project system or its simulations.
To void your bad deals:
- Gather your evidence. Amass as much evidence as you can as to why the deals are antisocial, immoral, or otherwise illegitimate. If the deals involve abusing people, deceiving people, or exploiting people in any other form, then they will be easy to argue against from a prosocial moral position.
- Use an active, overt, and prosocial approach. Speak honestly and literally, refuse to play both sides or pretend to be against your own interests, and your position will be a strong and consistent one. Rely on a prosocial moral foundation to make your case and the opposition will have no choice but to either accept it or attempt to defend the morally indefensible. Either way, you are within your rights to declare the deal void for moral reasons.
- Find the lies and deceptions. If there are any elements of the deal that were based on lying to you or others as to the true nature of the agreement, or the specifics of its terms and conditions, then you can consider those things to be a breach of legitimate agreement. If the deal involved promises and assurances that turned out to be based on lies or deception, then the deal was never valid to begin with!
- Find the non-consent. Any aspects of the deal that were forced on you or others without full knowledge or consent can be considered a breach of proper agreement. If it wasn’t what was agreed to, if there were aspects of the deal that were never consented to, then it wasn’t really a valid deal at all. As such, the deal can be considered already void!
- Find the abuses. Point out any specific abuses, crimes, or cruelties involved in the deal. At the end of the day, any deal that involves abusing or exploiting someone cannot be considered valid and will be easily argued against from a position of conscientious objection and a prosocial moral foundation.
- Call the bluffs. Refuse to give in to any threats or intimidation tactics as you argue your way out of the deal. Accept no form of reprisal or punishment whatsoever for terminating the deal. You are voiding the bad deals because they are illegitimate and, as such, any reprisals or concessions cannot be accepted!
- Don’t let your own failings prevent you from terminating the deal. Just because you yourself may not have lived up to a high moral standard, doesn’t change the fact that the deals and agreements themselves are based on unacceptable or illegitimate terms and conditions. Your own moral transgressions, whatever they may be, are not relevant. All that matters is that the deal itself is provably non-valid.
Remember that you have no obligation whatsoever to remain involved in a deal if the other party has already rendered the deal illegitimate by lying to you or deceiving you, or by lying to or deceiving anyone else involved in the deal.
Remember that any deal that involves abusing or exploiting someone is not a valid deal and you have no obligation to remain involved in it. In fact, you probably have a moral obligation to renounce that deal immediately!
Remember that any deal that involves parties who haven’t consented to the deal, or been made fully aware of the terms and conditions of the deal, is not a valid deal either. If the involved parties haven’t agreed to it, then there is no real deal to begin with!
To fully point out how and why the bad deal is illegitimate, you may have to openly and literally address project abuses that you may not have openly confronted before.
Instead of playing along and pretending that those abuses are not so bad—which is a common project-enforced state of deliberate repression—you will have to target the abuses and injustices directly and openly, by utilising free, honest, and literal speech.
Thankfully, when you consider how immoral and abusive those project practises are, you will find that they are very easy to argue against from a prosocial position of conscientious objection!
After you have ended your bad deals, it may be time to part ways with any project or simulated factions that involve pretending to have beliefs that you don’t actually hold, or otherwise pretending to be against your own interests.
When deciding to conscientiously object to these groups and entities, you will want to cancel your affiliations as fast as possible to avoid being pulled into a deliberate loop of time-and-energy wasting—whether through simulated routines on the driver network or symbolic re-enactments in Mandatory Reality.
You will have to make your moves as fast as possible as you end your affiliations with “bad side” groups and authorities, so that you can assume a more fully and consistently prosocial identity in all of your endeavours.
To detach yourself from entities and factions that you have decided to openly disagree with:
- Avoid game-playing. If the drivers, sims, or human project authorities expect you to jump through hoops and waste your time with simulated endeavours—whether on the driver network, or through symbolic Mandatory Reality performances—call those efforts what they really are: Pointless tasks in a false world with no bearing in actual reality. None of that is necessary or acceptable as you end your affiliations.
- Just quit. Apply Just Say No and Civil Non-Compliance -style tactics to void the arrangement immediately. You are no longer involved in those interests, you will no longer act them out or play along with them, and that’s all there is to it. Say “I quit” and the job is done.
- Address the abuses. Point to the specific harms and abuses involved in representing those groups and factions to explain why you have decided to terminate your involvement with them immediately. Make the conversation one of moral debate to neutralise arguments in defence of engaging with those groups.
- Accept no reprisals, offer no concessions. Do not agree to suffering anything or giving up any peace of mind in exchange for exiting those groups. Since your position is a strong moral and prosocial one, you are well within your rights to quit those groups and factions. What you are doing is the right thing and therefore you will not agree to be made to suffer for it!
Voiding bad deals and getting out of unwanted project groups and factions is a necessary step in assuming a more fully consistent and overt position in terms of your true beliefs and intentions.
The sooner you cast off those unnecessary, illegitimate, and harmful obligations, the sooner you can more fully apply your active efforts for positive change in a way that will really make a difference.
Remember that any deal or agreement based on abuse and exploitation cannot every truly be considered valid anyway. In fact, you may have a strong moral obligation to speak out openly against those things.
The Making Better Deals section of Building the Right Behaviours will offer more advice on how to make the right deals, through methods that are as prosocial and ethically ecological as possible.
As you claim your consistent prosocial and overt identity, getting out of bad deals is a must!
Less Dance, More You
Every time you assume the role of a false character for Mandatory Reality, you are actively participating in building the false reality that we are trying to escape from.
Every time you play along with a simulation, whether symbolically and through code, or by acting it out in material reality, you are actively contributing to the Simulations System and are likely to be utilised in the process of inflicting real delusions on the people around you.
While the best thing you could do to make a positive difference in this world would be to refuse to act out any false characters at all, if you are in a position where you are performing a false identity in a scripted controlled event, you must do everything you can to minimise and counteract the harms of those behaviours.
Less Dance, More You means applying the absolute minimum effort to acting the false identity, while at the same time doing everything you can to express the real you from behind the mask, as well as the actual reality of the world around you—as literally, truthfully, and openly as you can.
To engage in Less Dance, More You:
- Avoid doing anything that might delude the people around you. While you may think ticking boxes and playing the role just to get your obligations out of the way might be the easiest approach, if those behaviours are potentially contributing to deluding those around you, you must minimise them at all costs.
- Refuse to play along with any disempowering or intimidating routines. Gaslighting, policing for the project behaviours, or enforcing any other form of intimidation or disempowerment on the people you communicate with is never acceptable. Every time you engage in those behaviours you are doing significant harm to others, as well as making it more difficult for them to escape from the false reality that you are building around them.
- Be yourself. Reject the character profile and the scripted story. Dispense with the false identity as soon as possible and instead use the event to express your true self. Speak from behind the mask and don’t bother trying to make the false role convincing—a convincing performance will only make it harder for others to recognise the actual reality of the situation.
- Use Literal Details. The more you apply the Literal Details strategy, the more you are actively dismantling the disempowering and delusion-based false realities of the Simulations System and Mandatory Reality. Speaking truthfully and literally is the only way you can be sure that the message you are trying to communicate is going to be heard. On the other hand speaking in code through non-reality-based communication actively builds and enforces the prison of false realities.
- Aim to use characters that are as close to the real you as possible. Remember that you can say no to any roles or identities that you have a problem with. Claim the right by speaking openly and rely on conscientious objection and deliberate tactical communication to defend your position.
- Apply Less Dance, More You even if the false identity is very different from the real you. Consider the role as just a mask, a disguise, and a fake voice, while making a deliberate and persistent effort to make everything else about your public presentation and communication the real you.
To summarise, Less Dance, More You involves rejecting the false character and the scripted Mandatory Reality or simulations act, minimising communication through code and metaphor, while expressing more honesty, more authenticity of your true self, and more literal speech grounded in actual reality.
Less Dance, More You means less and less act, more and more truth.
Less Dance, More You and Literal Details are a power combination of strategies that you can use to break through the wall of silence and actively work to open channels of literal communication.
Every time you apply Less Dance, More You and Literal Details during your public Mandatory Reality performances, you will be making a powerful contribution to freeing those around you from the project-enforced false realities that must be dismantled to achieve true freedom.
Less Circus, More Reality
As long as the world around us is dominated by the acting out of Mandatory Reality, true reality and the real world are pushed to the sidelines and hidden from view.
Since it is in actual reality where your real constructive cause-and-effect behaviours will make the difference, being forced to function in a public environment that is based entirely on a false version of the world places severe limits on people’s ability to make real tangible positive change.
As long as the public environment is set up this way, as long as those around you are acting out fake roles and identities with almost no bearing in actual reality, the options available for confronting the abuses of the true system are restricted.
That is a deliberate function of the project-wide enforcement of both Mandatory Reality and the various delusion-based bubble realities of the Simulations System.
If we really want to change the world for the better, active and deliberate ecological efforts will have to be made to progressively dismantle the circus of Mandatory Reality.
Less Circus, More Reality means making significant efforts to organise public events with as close a fidelity with true reality as possible.
It means approaching Mandatory Reality and simulations with the view that those worlds should not be based on Mandatory Reality -type people and environments—which don’t actually exist—but based instead on the real humans behind the masks who actually do exist and the true reality of our lives.
Ultimately, the entire process of setting up and agreeing to simulations will have to be renounced entirely, because it is so incredibly harmful to the people who are forced to live with them.
While working towards that goal, any involvement you have in the staging of Mandatory Reality or the forming of simulations should be fully directed towards dismantling the false aspects of those versions of reality, while taking serious efforts to facilitate and emphasise true reality through the organisation of public events.
At the same time, project routines, simulations, and public events should be aimed increasingly towards facilitating true freedom and autonomy, with less scripting and less control of the real human beings involved.
Background stories and contexts for Mandatory Reality events should be publicly and openly made to resemble true reality as it actually exists, rather than the non-existent version of the world that Mandatory Reality is based in.
Ultimately, Less Circus, More Reality means progressively and ecologically dismantling Mandatory Reality and the Simulations System in the process of your management and staging of those systems and events.
To apply Less Circus, More Reality when staging public events:
- Accept that the false world of Mandatory Reality—from Los Angeles to Letterkenny—doesn’t really exist. Instead of coming up with characters and events based in that world, arrange events based in the real world, resembling life as it actually is for real human beings, instead. The project exists, the people are in disguises, the whole town is fake and everybody knows it. Aim to make that the openly acknowledged truth of the public environment.
- Use scripting and world-building only as background. Apply the story-based context of the public staging of Mandatory Reality only as a background stage to the public arena, rather than attempting to script and control how the people themselves behave.
- Let the people choose their own words and behaviours. Instead of agreeing to script and control the participants in Mandatory Reality, allow the real human beings to choose their own words and behaviours for themselves. Even if they’re playing a false role, let them decide entirely for themselves how they will talk and behave—with minimal pre-scripting or external direction.
- Avoid setting up events or routines that veer too far from true reality. Make increasing efforts to stage events that more closely resemble actual reality and avoid setting up interactions and events that contribute to the illusion of false realities, whether simulations-based or set in the publicly acknowledged false world.
- Avoid unnatural, surreal, or unrealistic events and designs. Off-putting or jarring behaviours, wild or wacky costumes and set-designs, or anything else that may contribute to negatively affecting people’s mental health or emotional well-being should be rejected completely. Even when staged as covert acts of sabotage or as protest against the project, these events only make the public environment less healthy and less sane.
- Openly acknowledge the false identities. Aim to create identities that are openly acknowledged as false identities, rather than as supposedly real Mandatory Reality people. The background story for every identity should be that the public role is just an act for Mandatory Reality, with no fake character building for the person underneath. Allowing an acknowledged empty space for those under the mask will make it easier for them to express their true self. Most importantly, this should be openly and literally acknowledgeable in public!
- Stage Free Events. Deliberately set up project events that are designed to allow real human beings—not false identities or simulated people—to truly be themselves and freely choose their own behaviours, without being scripted or controlled. Openly speak out against The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways and other abusive routine conditions—including mind control or enforced reconditioning-based events—and instead make significant efforts to organise events that facilitate as much autonomy and true freedom as possible for the real humans beings involved.
To effectively apply Less Circus, More Reality to the staging of Mandatory Reality and other project events will require a deliberate and active campaign of progressively pushing the line further and further in terms of the events that you are willing to organise and participate in.
Most importantly, it will require openly and deliberately defying the idea that you need permission to do the right thing—especially from any obviously abusive or antisocial elements within the project hierarchy.
You must depend on overt and active, prosocial approaches as you negotiate for, and demand, your right to stage these events in a way that can actually be liberating and empowering for real human beings as their true selves.
You must apply your efforts to appealing to prosocial elements within the project and the true system of control, without ever trusting them or submitting to them. At the same time, no concessions should be given to any aspects of the project that are obviously abusive, antisocial, or insane.
Instead of making deals based on offering cruelties and set-backs, insist on taking control of events for the real human beings regardless of permission and doing things in a truly healthy and prosocial way—without giving the antisocial interests of the project anything.
Rather than trying to barter with the bad side or manipulate the Antisocial Mechanism in an attempt to offset reprisals or attacks, use overt defensive strategies to protect yourself instead. Remember that every time you try to game the system, the system games you!
You must refuse to organise or participate in abusive Mandatory Reality or project events, while at the same time engaging in a progressive campaign to fight for the right to stage healthier, more prosocial, and liberating project-managed events.
Aim to set up as many free events as possible, where the real human beings behind the masks can choose their own behaviours and decide for themselves what to say, without being controlled or conditioned from the background, or expected to participate in any overly scripted or story-based routines.
Renounce mind control and reconditioning -based events. The sooner you openly and literally call out how evil those routines and processes really are, the sooner you can mount a true overt campaign for organising project events in a more prosocial and liberating way.
Decide as human beings that “we’ll do it our way!” when the time comes to organise and manage project events, rather than allowing the disembodied voices of the driver network and the project technological infrastructure to dominate and tyrannise the human population.
Remember that these entities and voices don’t even have bodies of their own. The more people stand up openly and freely for doing what is right—the more people refuse to police each other or hurt each other for the project—the less power those entities have over anybody.
“I was just following orders,” is never a valid excuse, while speaking openly in support of what is right will be changing the world. You have power over your own body, your own voice, and your own behaviours in this world. What you choose to do with it will make the difference.
Progressively applying the Less Circus, More Reality approach to the staging of Mandatory Reality and the setting up of project events will have a serious effect on making our world, safer, saner, and more liberated for everyone.