We didn’t make it on Saturday, we were closer than we’ve ever been, and so many would have crossed the line if the drivers hadn’t stopped it. It should have happened and it was possible. Only a couple of years ago it wouldn’t have been, but it certainly was this weekend. And all because of the changes you’ve fought to make from within. We must now ensure that we keep advancing those changes, presenting a united front to make sure that we make true freedom from the project a soon reality.

So what went wrong on Saturday? First and foremost, the absolute unavoidable fundamental, is the script. Not the project script—not the plan for how the show’s going to set up its controlled and acted events for the day—but the real “script” from above. The “direct control” that decides and plans not just every aspect of our lives and behaviour, but the entire world around us—regardless of what the project or the drivers seem to be planning on the ground.

Can we beat direct control?

No, not really.

Can we study it, anticipate it, and even use it to our advantage?

Yes, sometimes we can.

Differentiating Levels of Control

There are multiple forms of control the true system of our world inflicts upon us. There is the chain-of-command, the project orders: the ones you’re supposed to follow—or at least work with—because you’re supposed to be working for the project and setting up the show.

Then there’s the drivers, who mimic human beings and pretend to do things more or less the project way, while using “mind control” processes to direct us. Drivers are very heavy on the pay-to-play and working-both-sides game and they claim that only when you stop doing things that way, will they stop. While there’s probably truth in that, they certainly don’t make it easy. Regardless, you cannot ever trust them.

Finally, there’s the aforementioned “direct control”, the real power over our lives and behaviour, which functions irrespective of whether you follow project orders or listen to the drivers. As we all know, we are being controlled by this during literally every moment of our lives.

For the time-being, you can’t really beat direct control, but with the way things currently work it does have to filter through your personality profile. In other words, what you believe, what your values are, what your behavioural habits and inclinations lean towards, what skills and experiences you’ve gained—this is what direct control considers when it decides the potential actions and behaviours you will enact. You have to take as much charge of those things as you can.

When you decide adamantly that you are going to achieve or become something, that is what direct control has to pace with. When your values, beliefs, and ethics are set in stone, that is the range of options direct control is limited to whenever it chooses for you.

Project control is what you’re going to break free from. Drivers are what you’re going to defy. Project control and the drivers are the chain-of-command. They claim to want you to work for them and follow the project plan. That you can beat.

You can reach a point where instead of you following the drivers, the drivers have to follow you—or at least your personality profile and the beliefs, values, and intentions you’ve claimed for it. Focus as much as you can on your true strengths and the many skills you’ve developed over the years, as well as your deepest values and best beliefs to keep the drivers on their toes.

You take more control of your personality profile by amending your values and intentions, deciding new behaviours in advance, and choosing to be as determined as you can be when it comes to standing up for your beliefs, values, and ethics. You already do this every time you openly disagree with the drivers or the project directives. Every time you say to the project: “no, we’re doing things a different way!”

Saying no to the drivers and the project, especially while working for the show, is what we need all of you to be doing more and more. Rather than trying to persuade them to see things your way or to give you permission to do what you believe is right, you are instead taking the initiative from the drivers and saying: “I will do what I think is right, regardless of what the drivers or the project say.”

Not only will that make things better in the moment, it will make it so much easier for you when the time comes to say no to the project forever.

No More Mister Bad Guy: Conscientious Objection and the Ethical Boundary

There are many things that you just won’t do no matter how hard the project or the drivers pressure you. None of you would murder someone or severely hurt a child, there are many less bad things that you refuse to do as well. That is your Ethical Boundary. It’s the point where you say “No, I’m just not doing that, no matter the consequences”.

If we are going to make life easier as we prepare to achieve your true exit from the project, we need to mount a serious campaign to push everybody’s ethical boundary much further against the project in many, many ways. Both with the little things and the big things—and especially when it comes to playing the bad side. We are going to have to present a strong united front in service of standing up for ethical behaviours—with an extremely low tolerance for driver and project commands that we consider morally wrong. You already know the difference between right and wrong. We need to mount a new campaign, beginning now, where each of us is standing up for it much more often. The more you stand up against the drivers, the more you say no to the project, the easier it will be to stand up and say no when you go fully masks-off.

(Remember the drivers don’t have bodies of their own. We’re the only ones physically here and we must claim our right to our own material world. When we all stand up for doing things the right way, the drivers have no option but to work with our choices, instead of the other way around.)

There are some really bad things that some of you have been willing to do for the project that many others who still work for the project actually refuse to ever do. Some people won’t steal or stage a fight under any circumstances, even if they’re told they have to. They. Just. Say. No.

In fact, most of them have said no to those things so many times that the drivers don’t even bother trying any more. That’s what happens when you mount and defend your ethical boundary. If you won’t give up, the drivers give up.

If you are someone who still does those types of things when told to, you’ve been fooled into thinking you don’t have a choice. Actually you do. You need to wake up and realize that many of the people around you every day have already made that stand and they’re getting by just as fine as you are. In fact, you’ve definitely asserted your ethical boundary and won with multiple other beliefs and behaviours before. It’s time to make that stand again with these things too, every time you face them.

When it comes to the bad behaviour, you say: “I may work for the project, but I will not ever do that—because it is wrong.”

As long as you are adamant and determined, as long as your position is a moral one, eventually the drivers and the project do and will back down.

Unfortunately, what happens next is where it seems to have trapped most of you. The idea goes that if you’re not willing to do something bad because you’re too strongly opposed to it, then you have to do something less bad instead. As if moral opposition to immoral behaviours doesn’t apply here as well. It does.

The whole concept of trading a less bad thing for a worse thing is nothing but a con game, a ruse to trick you into thinking you have to hurt each other in lesser ways because it’s already failed to make you hurt each other in worse ways. Believing that you “have to” in this instance, is the exact same fallacy that it has used to trap those who’ve been conned into believing they “have to” steal or do something violent when told to. The real key truth here is that an ethical boundary is supposed to be used against anything you deem immoral or wrong at all, including trading a less bad behaviour for a worse one. It’s time to stand up against that concept too and when you do, you can do it because you believe that is both morally wrong and essentially a fallacy.

The Antisocial Mechanism will hurt us with any excuse it can find and you are not really holding it back when you do its work for it! You are just trading one form of hurt for another. Having to act out its petty little cruelties in fear of worse harms is its own form of long-term suffering—and you do not know how other people will respond, or how bad it will be for them, when you do these things to others. If the project hurts you for fighting back, then at least this way you’re getting closer to freedom instead of further away. You add it all up, the hurt ends up about the same anyway, but this way you’re actually building positive changes into our world.

Sometimes, you have to be selfish in a prosocial way. Sometimes you have to make a stand for going your own way no matter what those around you seem to be doing. If the projects tells you it’ll just make somebody else do it, or it’ll hurt the people around you instead, or you’re the only one doing things the right way and it’ll turn them all against you, you have to stand firm. You’re not the one hurting anyone, you’re not the one making anyone else play for the bad side, you’re refusing to hurt anyone, you’re refusing the bad side, and you must never give in to those types of project intimidation.

The truth is a lot of you go around hurting each other in a lot of little ways because you think you have to, either to score points with the bad side, to mitigate worse damages, or to pay for gains on the Suffering Economy so something important can be achieved later. All of that is a con. Things only seem to work that way because the project pretends that they do. Most of this stuff really is just a lot of convoluted exercises for the Antisocial Mechanism and it’s been going on so long and has trapped so many people in its routines that they can’t even properly recognize it.

There are loads of people who already refuse to play for the bad side a lot of the time, and don’t do anything near as hurtful as some of the things others have been tricked into thinking they have to do. When everybody refuses to play for the bad side at all, on grounds of personal moral belief, our world will get so much better. There’s no reason why the project can’t function when real human beings refuse to play the bad side. You might be afraid to leave it up to the drivers, but guess what, when we don’t play that way, they play that way less too. And drivers will play their own stupid games anyway. We real human beings don’t have to.

A good mentality to build, defend, and assert is: “Sure, I’ll still work for the project, I’m just not going to play the bad side or do hurtful things any more. I’ll do other things for the project, as long as they aren’t hurtful.”

We all must mount a united campaign against the idea that anyone has to “play for the bad side” in any of its different forms, or do anything whatsoever that is intended to hurt—including accepting hurtful behaviours that are directed at themselves too. When we all make a stand against this, the whole system will change.

Remember this: the drivers claim they’re only “playing” the bad side too and they’re supposed to be based on us. When you change your game, their game has to change as well. Life would be a lot easier with drivers who don’t play the bad side. It will be a lot easier when real humans don’t either.

Conscientious objection—as in, refusing something because you deem it immoral—is as bullet proof as you can get when it comes to arguing against the project directives. After all, one of the project’s major weaknesses is that it has to pretend to be a good thing. Use that against it.

Decide here and now that you are no longer going to play for the bad side any more and nor are you going to do anything whatsoever that is intended to hurt. Let the drivers try to find somebody else. But if everyone does things this way, they won’t find anyone to act out their hurtful words and behaviours at all. And the project will just have to accept it.

The Fight for Reality

The simulations and the show go hand in hand. As long as there’s some simulated battle to play, some simulated person who needs to have their mind changed, the project has an excuse to make you act out the show. We all spent our lives trapped at various levels of delusion, based on the simulated worlds that were being forced on us. Those who knew the most, fought tooth and nail to get as much truth as possible to as many people as they could. One of the hardest things about this was that the project said you had to beat the simulations, through the simulations. So that is what you did.

Fidelity—making two contrasting things completely equal—was one of the most successful strategies. The more like reality the simulation is, the closer to true reality we are. That truism still stands.

But the project never stops making up new simulations. There are simulations within simulations and simulations within those simulations. There are simulations that we only play along with for the show, and overarching simulations that we are constantly being pulled into, to the point where we’re deluded into actually believing them. This is how Central and its Shells functioned for all the people trapped within them. (And of course, one person’s “show” simulation, is a false reality that another person might actually believe, so always be careful!)

In terms of fidelity, those overarching simulated realities, the ones that the project actually tries to make us believe, are so close now to actual true reality that fidelity has essentially been achieved. This fidelity represents the true doorway to reality and you cross it when you fully reject acting out or playing along with the simulations at all.

To build a fidelity with actual reality into the simulations, you had to play the simulations. But now that there’s enough reality there to open the door, playing the simulations as a strategy has become one with diminishing returns. In fact, playing the simulations and wasting time solving problems only under symbolic circumstances often works against what we’re really trying to achieve: real tangible changes in actual reality.

Let’s take conscientious objection as an example. We want everybody to say no to playing the bad side from now on, based on ethical reasons. Now the simulated way of doing that, which the project will try to make you do, will say “ok, go act out one hundred simulated people making that choice and then that will change the simulations”. But we’re much too far for that strategy now. We need to do this in actual reality and let the simulations take a backseat.

Instead of acting out simulated people making that decision, you make that decision for yourself for real—and refuse to act any simulated people who disagree. Since simulated people are supposed to be based on what we do and say, you’re already changing them this way anyway.

Acting out the sims is a waste of time right now, and a deliberate one, but making the choice for real yourself is real change in action. That is claiming reality.

When it tells me it’s basing simulated people on my behaviour, I say: “well sure, you can do that, but I’m not changing my beliefs or opinions at all. You can say I’m the bad side, but I’m not going to act like the bad side. You can say I’m any type of person but I’m still not going to change my values, beliefs, or behaviours whatsoever.” Even though I’m not really trying to, this still changes those sims by bringing them more in line with how I actually behave. Refusing to change your beliefs or behaviour for the simulations, changes the simulations too. So refuse to play the bad sims and the bad sims change—or disappear entirely.

Surface level communication is one way the project constantly tries to build up new simulations and simulated people—simulated people that it will then try to make into your problem to deal with. If you communicate something in code, while saying something else on the surface, e.g. if you say something like “oh, I don’t know what’s really going on the world, all I know is that it’s because of the immigrants and their hurtful behaviour” while trying to hint that you’re actually speaking about the project and its sims, the project will turn around and make new simulated people who really are that way. Based on what you said on the surface, it will now claim there are new sims who don’t know what’s going on in the world, who literally hate immigrants, and who want to act hurtfully. And then it will try to make them a problem for real people to solve, or use them as an excuse to push people into behaving hurtfully—since the sims want to act hurtfully—despite their own true intentions.

The surface level communication of what you say is a seriously fertile breeding ground upon which the project builds up its simulations. Always keep that in mind. Every time you pretend you don’t know what’s really going on, every time you play at being ignorant, mean, or aggressive as a fake persona, the project uses that to build new sims based on those behaviours. And then that’s the false reality you’re stuck having to deal with. That is why it tells you to play that way: because it uses it to keep stacking up the simulated walls of its simulated prison.

Ultimately, as long as the project can tell you what to do, it can always come up with some new simulated excuse to make you go out and act. It doesn’t ever want the dance to end and the only way out is not through playing the simulations, but by saying no to the simulations entirely.

For now, refusing to play the bad side, refusing to act out ignorant or antisocial sims, and refusing to do anything deliberately intended to be hurtful will represent a major shift in preventing the project from making the simulations any worse. It will, in fact, make them much better. That said, as long as you still have to act for the show, it won’t be anywhere near close enough to what you actually need and deserve: true reality and freedom from the project.

Continue working as much literal truth into your speech as possible when playing project identities, minimize arguing against the truth or actual reality, and watch out for anything that might be stacking up the simulated realities against us—because those are the ones it will turn around and say you have to act out or solve.

Actual reality is much stronger than the simulations. When you acknowledge true reality openly, the simulated false reality collapses because the simulations can only function when real human beings play along. Resist the simulations in every way that you can, even when acting the project roles. As I said previously, keep pushing the boundary with less metaphor, less play-acting, less doublespeak, and more honesty, more authenticity, more literal speech. Build it into the dance, with less and less dance, more and more truth. Show more of who you really are and less of the persona. You’ve been doing it and it is working!

Remember you can’t only rely on code and metaphor to play the simulations, what you’re saying on the surface has a really big effect too!

Final Words

It hit us hard on Saturday. It was a cruel and painful day—a result that cannot be justified for any reason, or with any excuse. Does it expect us to just bow our heads now and get back to work? To roll over and do its dirty work for it? That is not going to happen.

We are going to push forward aggressively on all fronts, standing up against the drivers and the project chain-of-command in every way that we can and we are going to do it for what is good and decent and right. The more we defy the drivers and say no to the project hierarchy, the more we refuse to follow any hurtful orders at all—or accept any hurtfulness directed at us—the more ready we are to say no to the project forever, in all its many forms.

There are a million opportunities a day to put these strategies into action and you can be sure that each and every one of us is on your side when you do. Remember that this is not about persuading the drivers or the project to see things your way, or asking them for permission to let you do the right thing. This is about standing up and claiming the right to do the right thing, whether they give you permission or not! In fact, when they tell you you’re not allowed to do the right thing, that’s exactly when you make your stand and put these approaches into action!

Remember: you are doing what you believe is good and right and you are refusing to do what the project and the drivers want, because their way is obviously morally wrong. The position is as simple as that. But you must fight for it.

 It’s time to present a united front and stand together as we put these practices to work. And if the drivers don’t like it, they can use their own bodies to boss us around—because we are not going to police each other’s behaviours or hurt each other on their behalf any more.

We have taken enough shit from this evil project and the deliberately insane beings behind it. That most of you are still trapped within it as this new week begins is a severe injustice. Until the chance to walk out arises again—and it will soon—you must do everything you can now to tear this project down from within.

Stay sane, stay ethical, and stay clever, but whatever you do, for what the project did to us this weekend, hit it back twice as hard.

Note: I’ll be around town this afternoon from about 2 pm to 3 depending on how much is going on. There’s a huge amount of info in this article to consider so I’ll only update the website tomorrow and Thursday if something really important comes up. Stay strong everybody and hold your head up high, no matter what it throws at you. It’s giving everybody a lot of flack right now, be we do not give in!

Truth, Freedom, and Reality is a print and online newsletter devoted to human rights and the pursuit of truth in a post-Central world. This platform represents an uncompromising rejection of coded language, symbolic communication, and the constricts of Mandatory Reality. Instead, we place paramount value on free speech and the dissemination of uncensored, literal information. Our goal is to bolster a walk-away from the systemic chain-of-command and an open, public rejection of Mandatory Reality, as well as total freedom from the Simulations Project for all human beings.

New article content Tuesdays at www.truthfreedomreality.com and on medium @truthfreedomreality. Updates and announcements on the website most days.