The style of this article is positive and literal. If it seems otherwise, it’s because of driver interference.
Watch out for unnatural valences and unintended tones. Focus as much as possible on absorbing the literal details of the information presented. You can always return to the words later if the drivers are making it difficult.
Skip ahead to get to the strategies!
Contents
| Behind-the-Scenes: Applying the Strategies on the Other Side of Mandatory Reality |
| You Cannot Beat the Project with the Tactics it Taught you |
| Taking the Fight off the Driver Network and into Reality |
The Strategies of Overt Resistance Part Four
Behind-the-Scenes: Applying the Strategies on the Other Side of Mandatory Reality
One of the biggest difficulties in compiling this list of strategies has been the lack of information available to me personally in regards to the social environment as it exists behind the scenes of the management of Mandatory Reality.
While the information I have about the project and its history, about routine operations on the driver network and the public functioning of Mandatory Reality, is freely and openly presented on this website every day—many of even the most mundane aspects of how the public performance is managed behind the scenes remain “top secret”—officially, at least.
Even with extensive efforts from human beings in person to provide as much information as possible, both literally and through code, the specifics of the standard practises, daily functioning, and basic culture of the behind-the-scenes remains insufficiently vague and incomplete.
Without knowing the details of how things are managed and communicated—without ever having observed the normal progression of how a standard working day functions behind the curtain of public Mandatory Reality—it is very difficult to advise you exactly how, where, and when to apply these strategies in the best possible way to stand up for your rights.
That means it is up to you to make the effort to fit the strategies of overt resistance to the specific challenges of your daily life working on Mandatory Reality routines. While I know this is unfairly difficult, it is, for now, an unavoidable result of the lack of open communication enforced by the project.
In applying the strategies to the specific challenges you face, you must remember the fundamentals of prosocial overt action:
- Open and literal speech.
- Honesty, authenticity, and consistency in your position. (Choosing one side of the issue.)
- Taking constructive action openly, in actual reality.
- Honest and direct methods, rather than deceptive or manipulative ones.
- Conscientious objection to abusive or damaging practises.
- A strong prosocial foundation. (A motivation to help human beings and stand up against injustices.)
While the onus will have to be on you to formularise the right time and place—as well as the best way to apply the overt methods—when standing up for our rights as human beings while behind-the-scenes, it is absolutely vital that you ensure that your approach involves all six of the above criteria.
If your approach is a truly overt and prosocial one then you cannot sacrifice any of the six fundamentals. Make sure to plan your efforts when working with your chosen issues accordingly.
The fact that so much of the basic functioning of the behind-the-scenes is supposedly unspeakable is a ridiculous fact of where we currently stand. Every day on this website literal information concerning supposedly secret project practises is shared openly and in detail—while the project itself is rightfully and routinely vilified for its abuses without any attempt to obscure the message.
Meanwhile, even the most banal facts of life behind-the-scenes are treated by the project as though their secrecy is of the utmost importance—a guard-with-your-life-style protocol that has little basis in the reality of today.
While the absurdity of this is no doubt obvious to everyone, it should also be clear that the only real reason for this secrecy is to make life as difficult as possible for both sides of the equation.
The lack of specific, literal details available in public regarding the behind-the-scenes is a facet of the wall of silence that we will have to take significant efforts to dismantle.
Doing so will only make it easier for this website to more better meet your specific needs as you work to free yourself from the project.
You Cannot Beat the Project with the Tactics it Taught you
There are many tactics and strategies the project has taught you for surviving in a world dominated by simulated authorities and systems of varying levels of power and technological advancement.
Many of the simulated routines enforced by the project follow the pattern of a training routine—though, as with every project-managed event, these are frequently used as an excuse to torture and abuse their participants.
For example, almost all of you have participated in “runs”.
Runs are the project-managed events wherein a project agent must attempt to escape simulated entities while utilising stealth and survival tactics—usually by pursuing an off-road course through fields and countryside.
While the project tracks your every movement from within and around your body itself, the purpose of runs is to escape simulated authorities with far weaker surveillance capabilities than the project. The stealth and survival tactics deployed may or may not be sufficient to escape lesser authorities, but they would have no success whatsoever in escaping from the project’s surveillance.
Just as the tactics learned and applied during runs would not work when trying to escape the project’s awareness, many of the tactics and strategies the project has taught you for standing up against authority in other ways could not be successfully applied when standing up against the project itself and its very worst practises.
As has been addressed before, there are multiple examples of project tactics that are entirely self-defeating when attempting to overcome the project’s worst abuses.
This is because those tactics very often have a foundation in the same abuses that you’re trying to overcome.
For example:
You cannot use code and metaphor, or symbolic enactments, to break the wall of silence, because those things are the wall of silence in action. The only way to truly facilitate open channels of literal communication is to make significant efforts to utilise open, authentic, and literal speech.
You cannot use suffering as a tool or a commodity when the objective is to eliminate suffering itself. One of our biggest and most important needs as a a people is for the project to stop inflicting suffering as a standard function of its system. Trading or bartering in hurtful behaviours, including “pretend hurtful” behaviours—or agreeing to suffer in exchange for your goals—only bolsters and strengthens that suffering-based system. The right way to confront the suffering system is to conscientiously object to suffering in all its forms and refuse to ever validate any form of project abuse.
The strategies of overt resistance are much better suited to fighting the abuses of the project. When it comes to a refusal of permission to engage in the strategies, you must apply the strategies to that refusal too.
Overtly defy the lack of permission, while utilising and defending a conscientious position as your basis for breaking the rules.
The strong moral, open, and active foundation of the strategies has a direct effect on neutralising many of the project’s worst abuses without ever doing anything to facilitate or go along with them.
The strategies of overt resistance are completely and singularly against the project abuses that we are most determinedly trying to fight.
You cannot beat the system with the poisonous and self-defeating tactics it has taught you for fighting power, because those poisonous tactics are the system itself.
Taking the Fight off the Driver Network and into Reality
You cannot really beat the project through simulations.
The project is a real institution in our society, functioning in actual reality, and the actions necessary to weaken and dismantle it must likewise take place in reality.
While project tactics and simulated routines might suffice in overcoming simulated enemies, when the opposition is the project itself in actual reality, how, where, and when to take action must be accordingly amended.
In a world of constant driver interference, where nobody can ever trust their perceptions entirely, and nothing is experienced without the filter of sensory assault, the borders between simulation and reality are often hazy. When taking efforts on the driver network to make real change happen, this distinction is even more unclear.
While the driver network is the channel through which much of the human-to-human project business is conducted, the way that network functions is almost entirely simulations-based. Almost everything is communicated through codes and symbols, fake or obscured identities, and performative simulated routines.
On the driver network, it is never possible to tell for certain whether your communications are reaching actual human beings, or if the communications you are receiving yourself are coming from real human beings either. You never know for certain if your efforts are being treated as real project proceedings—or as events that will only have significant outcomes in simulated versions of reality.
Conducting business on the driver network has few advantages. While literal, honest, and authentic speech is generally looked upon more favourably than when communicating in person, the value of that communication is a mere fraction of its value when conducted openly and in person.
One of the problems is that no human being can ever verify whether their efforts on the driver network are really having any effect at all. If your communication does get through to other humans, it will be only through a deliberately polluted, Chinese-whispers-style filter. Hours of tortured effort regularly turn out to have been nothing but a fruitless exercise in driver-orchestrated time-wasting.
While the sensory agitation, time and energy wasting, and deliberately futile tasks that take place during these events are bad enough, when it turns out to have little practical effect on your actual goals in reality, it is even worse. Communications on the driver network are, blatantly, a frenzy of driver manipulation and driver abuse.
The driver network is not the appropriate arena for the true fight for freedom against the project.
The true campaign can only succeed if it is orchestrated primarily in material reality—in person—with real human beings conducting open and literal communication together. Serious effort is necessary to build an arena for this campaign in actual reality.
Opening channels of literal communication, progressively dismantling the public performance of Mandatory Reality, and defying the project’s absurdly limiting rules and regulations regarding free speech and secrecy are the main methods we must employ.
In terms of where you begin these efforts, you must focus on the specific challenges of the different environments you inhabit in your daily life. It is a certainty that the overt and prosocial approach will be the only successful way to achieve this.
I know it is easier and more permissible to discuss project practices behind-the-scenes of Mandatory Reality. This makes it a viable battleground in actual reality where you can mount a persistent campaign in support of increasing free speech and open communication.
This campaign will require taking calculated risks, regularly calling project bluffs, and engaging your voice as openly and as deliberately as you can.
Rather than devoting your time and energy to trying to persuade project authorities to give you permission to speak more freely (give it a decade and they might say ok, if you agree to something horrible), you must instead take the initiative to break the rules overtly by choosing to speak more and more freely anyway, while at the same time vigilantly defending your right to do so.
You must continuously push yourself to apply active overt and prosocial approaches to communication, even in the face of driver interference or project threats and reprisals.
That is how you fight to increase your right to speak freely.
Likewise, extensive efforts must be made during both the planning and performing of public Mandatory Reality. It is necessary to take deliberate action to progressively dismantle the maddening and oppressive facade of our public world—as well as to permit the free public expression of true and literal information as it pertains to the project and actual reality.
To bring the fight off the driver network and into reality, you must mount a strong and determined campaign. You must take every effort available to build more and more moments in actual reality where open literal communication can increasingly take place, to create a sufficient platform in reality for the wider efforts of the freedom movement.
You do this by applying the strategies of overt resistance to assert your right to speak more and more literally and more and more freely, while defending yourself against any of the potential challenges or risks.
You do this by heavily integrating the strategies of overt resistance into your efforts to take more and more control over how Mandatory Reality is staged and performed.
The right to break character during Mandatory Reality, for example, is a right that you must engage in before the project will concede that it is a right at all.
As we deploy more of our efforts to building actual reality in our interactions and environments, we will build the foundations of a strong platform to stand on when we more fully and openly direct our efforts against the project.
The Strategies of Overt Resistance Part Four
Parts One, Two, and Three of the Strategies of Overt Resistance covered the sections Breaking the Rules Overtly, Conscientious Objection, Inner-Game, Choosing a Side, Standing up to Authority, Facing Reprisals, and Facing Victory. Part Four Contains the Section Fighting for Reality.
Please note: the section Fighting for Reality is incomplete. More strategies will be added in the coming days.
Fighting for Reality
Breaking the wall of silence and building actual reality are fundamental necessities in the fight to dismantle the true controlling systems of our lives.
One of the primary functions of Mandatory Reality and the simulations system is to colonise the material world—as well as our subjective perceptions of it—with deliberately abusive and labour-intensive simulated versions of reality. At the same time, the true reality of our existence is denied and the systems-enforced wall of silence prevents free speech and open organisation among real human beings.
It is essential that we build true reality into our environments and actively facilitate open channels of literal communication in every way that we can. Doing so will create a much greater platform upon which to fight for our freedoms and exponentially weaken the true controlling systems that stand in our way.
The following strategies will assist you as you work to build actual reality into the world around you.
More Fighting for Reality strategies are coming soon.
Finding your Voice
One of the most powerful tools for building actual reality around you is your voice.
When you deliberately use your speech to introduce the true and literal facts of reality into the social environment around you, the whole world changes for the better.
Unfortunately, with driver interference and unacceptable project “rules” regarding free speech and secrecy, they don’t make it easy for you.
Not only that, but the potential presence of non-conscious people in your environment can also make the prospect of speaking literally and truthfully about actual reality seem even more daunting.
When choosing the moment to speak out for your chosen issues openly and literally, you must depend on your full set of strategies to ensure that you succeed in making your stand.
The previous sections of the Strategies of Overt Resistance, from Conscientious Objection to Inner-Game, Standing up Against Authority to Facing Reprisals, will assist you in defending yourself when you speak up openly for what you believe in.
Continue to build and develop your familiarity with the strategies. Practise them with the little things in actual reality, to build your confidence and defences for when the time comes to stand up openly on the more important issues.
When you have made the decision that you are going to speak up openly and literally in support of your chosen issues, you may find yourself facing an onslaught of driver interference.
The drivers may try to make it as difficult as possible for you to get the right words out.
They might make you sound awkward or feel uncomfortable. They might try to blank your mind or make it difficult for you to find the right words.
And yet you will have to push yourself to speak anyway.
Whether your communication sounds smooth or awkward, whether your emotional state feels unpleasant or not, is not particularly important.
What matters most is that you say what you have to say.
When finding your voice in the face of driver interference:
- Make sure you know your talking points. Write out the main talking points of your position before the time comes to put them into speech openly and literally. Ensure that you are well-versed in your chosen issues and have at least a rough outline of what you intend to say. When the time comes, all you have to do is get the words out. The article Proclamations for Claiming your Voice contains a list of suitable examples to practice with.
(Return to the strategies section Choosing a Side so that your position on your chosen issue is clear to all observers. As long as you’ve acknowledged your open position in regards to that issue, you don’t have to worry about drivers or simulated entities observing your work. Avail of the opportunity to put your true beliefs down on the page about your chosen issue, openly and literally.)
- Tolerate the sensory symptoms. Anxieties and awkward feelings are not enough to stop you from pushing forward. Weird tones and uncomfortable rhythms in your speech don’t matter that much, when compared to the importance of the literal information that you have to express.
- Read the room. Pay careful attention to the specific types of people you are speaking to. Quickly assess their emotional energy and personality styles. calibrate your communication in a way that will be as acceptable to each person as possible. For example, how you speak to a person who appears stand-offish and irritated should be very different to how you speak to a person who is more relaxed and open.
- Pause for the mind-blank. If the drivers make your mind go blank, or make it difficult to find the right words, pause to give yourself a moment to see if it passes. Often these attacks are temporary, or they come in waves, and it is much easier to speak in between. Even if the sensory interference persists, you must press on.
- Just get the words out. No matter how you feel on the inside, or what the drivers might be hitting you with, push yourself to get the literal words out as efficiently as you can. Say what you have to say and stake your claim for your chosen issue. Prepare to defend yourself against any pushback, from the drivers or other human beings.
- Stick to your strategies. No matter the interference, stay on course and keep your speech focused on your chosen issue as much as possible. Speak as literally and as openly as you can. If the opposition pushes you back into playing along or relying on code, temporarily step back into it if you have to, but only with a view to steering things back to the literal as soon as possible.
Remember that your voice is one of the most personal and powerful tools that you have within your power.
The more you use it, the more comfortable and confident you will be in your ability to speak freely, no matter the pushback.
A voice can be used either to build actual reality or to police the wall of silence.
The project wants you to use your voice for building false realities and telling lies on the surface, so that the people around you will be trapped having to play along.
That is what the code and metaphor approach to communication does, regardless of what else you use it for.
On the other hand if you claim your ability to speak openly and literally, about actual reality, you are staking a claim on the truth and creating a space around you where the true facts of life can be expressed.
When you use your voice to create true and literal expressions of our true life conditions, you are building moments of openly acknowledged actual reality that are essential for sanity and progress.
When the time comes to make your stand, engage every power available to you to find your voice.
Tell, Don’t Show
Codes, metaphors, and symbolic presentations apply the show-don’t-tell approach to communicating information.
Instead of giving the literal facts, the person receiving the message is supposed to interpret the clues to piece together the intended message.
Unfortunately it is impossible to ever truly communicate specific and detailed information this way.
In fact, driver keys are the true method of communication taking place during most of the symbolic expressions.
The drivers tell the person receiving the symbolic communication what the meaning is and that is how the message is actually understood—if the drivers decide to tell them at all, that is.
Just as often, the drivers offer a completely different message than the one intended—and usually an abusive one.
When using show-don’t-tell-style approaches, you cannot ever rely on the drivers to communicate the intended message for you.
The only way to really communicate the true nuance and detail of your message is by using literal and authentic speech and communication.
When it comes to spreading the message, you will have to apply a tell-don’t-show approach instead of show-don’t-tell.
When tailoring your communications for tell-don’t-show:
- Communicate literally. Decide to communicate the great majority of your message as literally as possible, as often as you can. You will have to employ the strategies of overt resistance to navigate the challenges along the way.
- Tell the truth. Be honest and authentic in what you are trying to communicate. Choose your side of the issue and be completely truthful about what you are attempting to say.
- Avoid cryptic language. The moment you resort to doublespeak, codes, metaphors, and other deliberately cryptic language tactics, the meaning of what you are trying to say becomes clouded anyway. When the drivers decide to subvert the message—as they regularly do—the opportunities are almost limitless in terms of the confusion and chaos that follows.
- Avoid secrecy. Place a high value in the free dissemination of information and aim to share as much pertinent knowledge as you can. An environment of free and open information is far more liberating than one of silence and secrecy. Rely on strategies like Calculated Risks and Calling the Bluff in the face of any driver threats or intimidation, as well as any appeals to “protect the plan” by playing along with secrecy routines.
You cannot use code, metaphor, and symbolic enactments to break the wall of silence because they are the wall of silence.
When working to create open channels of literal communication you must invest your time and energy in different, more literal strategies of communication.
As with Breaking The Rules Overtly, Tell, Don’t Show is a meta-strategy—a strategy of strategies—that must guide the overall direction of all of your overt communication strategies and tactics.
This is necessary as you work to break the wall of silence and open channels of literal communication.
When making substantial efforts to build actual reality for those around you—as well as creating the platform for your own overt position—you must do everything you can to plan your campaign with a meta-strategy of Tell, Don’t Show.
Building a Platform
One of the best ways to create more opportunities to utilise free, literal speech is to build a platform of background information during in-person conversation as a launchpad for speaking more freely about the actual reality of our lives.
As previously outlined in Facing False Ignorance, this is especially true when engaging in conversation with anyone who might potentially claim ignorance of the real known issues of the simulations system and Mandatory Reality.
If you find yourself uncertain as to the trustability of your conversation partners, or have any doubts as to how positive their responses will be, “telling them for the first time” about the background realities of these systems will strongly bolster your position.
Taking some time to lay out the core facts of our reality—especially in a neutral and uncontroversial manner—will protect you against the possibility of any bad faith challenges designed to shut down your efforts when practising free, literal speech.
Actual conscious human beings are certainly going to respond positively, but even if you find yourself suddenly or unexpectedly engaging with non-conscious people, these tactics will neutralise any attempts to limit your ability to claim actual true reality with free open speech.
To build your platform:
- Tell them for the first time. If the other party might be likely to claim ignorance of reality, explain the background facts to them as if you were telling somebody for the first time. Take time to briefly and simplistically explain any other background information to build a baseline for discussing your position. Now they can no longer deny that they know exactly what you’re talking about!
- Use tactical language to get around anything controversial in the subject matter. Look for the most neutral and acceptable way to explain anything that might sound far-fetched against the backdrop of Mandatory Reality. For example, you could describe the driver network as follows: “it’s a form of communication mainly controlled by AI, that can transmit speech from person to person. Like social media, or a phone call without the phone.”; the simulations system as: “the social control system of society designed to delude ordinary people into being trapped in different bubbles of false reality,” etc.
- Claim your beliefs firmly and confidently. Think of how readily a “conspiracy theorist” -type person will openly claim that the world is run by the Illuminati or some other secret system. Apply that same attitude of confidence and certainty when you speak about the actual truth. For example, you could say “the whole world is virtual reality, like the Matrix.
We call it Virtual Material Reality,” and then sit back without waiting for any validation from your conversation partner. If challenged, assert that it is simply what you believe. - Use an easy, conversational language style. Use terms like “you haven’t heard this?” and “oh yes, everybody knows about it,” to infuse your claims with the sense of common, everyday credibility. Limit any pauses when building your platform to avoid giving the other party a chance to deny the reality of your words. Just keep talking to dominate your claim on reality.
- If the other party tries to gaslight you or interrogate your position, stand firm and refuse to back down. They will just have to accept that what you are saying is true and that you have personal experience of it, even if they claim it sounds crazy. If they say they don’t believe you, calmly assure them that it’s the truth, whether they accept it or not.
- Use your platform as a launchpad for speaking more openly and authentically about other more detailed issues with the system. As soon as you’ve taken the time to build a stable context of background information, you can segue into speaking more authentically and literally about any other issue of the day. Let the platform be the lead-in to addressing whatever systemic issues you really want to discuss.
Building a platform of background information, whether with conscious conversation partners or non-conscious, will ensure your fight for reality has a strong defence to help protect you from challenge.
The more practice you gain in providing background information to your claims of reality—especially in casual, confident, and neutral-sounding ways—the easier you will find it to speak literally and freely about true reality to anyone.
Literal Details
One of the most powerful communication tactics at your disposal is the ability to speak literally.
While navigating the minefield of project-enforced communication can be a dangerous game—and it is rarely possible to speak literally for the entire duration of a conversation—injecting tactical literal sentences into your communication is an extremely powerful strategy for communicating as openly and freely as you can.
These precision shots of literal communication are one of the most valuable tools in your artillery when you mount your campaign to increase your right and ability to speak more freely.
The appropriate content for your Literal Details include:
- Anything that is considered potentially unsafe to speak about in public. Test the waters and push the boundary. Begin with smaller, safer subjects and work your way up to the big ones.
- Anything that is sufficiently complicated or nuanced as to require literal and detailed communication to express. In other words, if you couldn’t get the full message across in code or metaphor, then you need to speak literally.
- Anything that is in the public interest, or in the interest of those you’re communicating with. If they have a right to know, or they need to know, then you have an obligation to tell them.
- Anything pertaining to project practises, the driver network, and the simulations system, supposedly classified or otherwise.
When using Literal Details, you must apply a strong game of deliberate and tactical communication, maintaining focus both on your defences and your active measures.
Dip back into playing along, or speaking in code, to deflect and out-manoeuvre bad faith or pretend ignorance tactics—but only if you absolutely have to—while always keeping your target on shooting the false communication with Literal Details the moment you get your chance.
If the other party challenges you, there are a number of evasive language strategies you can engage in to protect your position and to steer the conversation to safer territory.
It is possible to place your Literal Details in the context of an explanation that will be difficult for the opposition to argue with, while still being truthful—though this Perfect Deflection is an advanced technique and requires confidence and fluidity with the strategies.
For example, if they challenge you for deploying the Literal Details “the weather is completely technologically controlled”, you can use true but neutral-sounding language to explain your claim, without having to resort to lying to cover your position.
If you’d spoken to someone before about the same issue, you could explain that your reference pertains to “an interesting conversation that you had recently with someone you met, by chance, and you are still considering its perfect validity and how truly true it really is.”
Or, if you hadn’t spoken to anyone about it, you could say something like: “Oh yes, I’m absolutely sure of it, in fact the evidence is everywhere. Haven’t you noticed how unnatural the weather is lately?”
Either way, the content of your evasive language strategy in the examples above is truthful.
This is extremely important because truthful statements will still be contributing to breaking the wall of silence and building actual reality.
On the other hand, using false statements and coded attempts to deflect would be slipping back into playing along with false realities, while at the same time running the risk of getting tangled up in statements that might be difficult to defend.
True claims on reality—even when they’re more neutral—are always building actual reality around you, every time you use your voice. As such, Perfect Deflection is an ecological strategy because it does not contradict or challenge any of your other strategies or main goals.
Always remember:
- Lying about reality and playing along puts you back where the system wants you—unable to speak your truth freely and at the mercy of drivers to do your most detailed communicating for you.
For comparative tactics look to the Facing False Ignorance and Building a Platform strategies.
The section Clever Communication will contain several more strategies for communicating as efficiently, tactically, and ecologically as possible.
Or you can waffle and deflect your way out of the challenge, with any excuse from “oh, you must have misheard me,” to “I was listening to a podcast that claimed that was true”. These tactics are also often necessary and are generally safer when facing a more difficult opposition.
The more time you devote to taking control of the communication that follows your Literal Details—the more words and sentences you use to set the direction of the conversation—the more you can steer the other party away from being able to adequately challenge you on behalf of the project.
The Perfect Deflection examples above do this by making the follow-up sentence as meandering, neutral-sounding, and long-winded as possible.
Your tactics for protecting your Literal Details and steering the conversation forward should be structured to protect and bolster literal truth and actual reality as much as possible.
At all times you must prevent yourself from being pushed back into playing along with a false reality.
Before engaging in your deliberate effort to break through the wall of silence and open channels of literal communication, you should decide upon a few short sound-bites in advance to communicate when using Literal Details.
Make them as tactical and as beneficial to your goals as possible.
The article Proclamations for Claiming your Voice contains some pre-prepared examples to practice with.
Base the Literal Details on your chosen issues or main position to combine the strategy with your wider goals for utilising the strategies of overt resistance.
When constructing and utilising your Literal Details:
- Endeavour to fit as many full and literal expressions about the true systems of our world—from the simulations system to Mandatory Reality—into your communication as you can.
- Use full factual sentences based in actual reality. Inject them into your conversation between other less literal communication styles.
- Deliberately replace as many code words or metaphors with the literal terms and meanings when you talk about the challenges we face. For example: literally say “drivers” instead of “politicians”; “the project” instead of “the football association”; “the simulations system” instead of “the war in Gaza”; etc.
(Using literal systemic terms may be the most important aspect of the strategy because it takes a direct shot at the free speech restrictions most necessary to confront. We need to be able to talk about these things in public, literally and in detail.)
- Create opportunities to express your Literal Details. Deliberately build your communication towards safe moments to express your message. Engage in more casual conversation until you trust that the party you’re communicating with is on your side and then take your chance. Strategies like Building a Platform can provide you with a safe platform to express your Literal Details.
- Be tactical, but persistent. Dance in and out of playing along with the fake routines or speaking in code, moving forward to deploy your Literal Details as often as possible. Cover yourself with defensive strategies in the face of any pushback.
It is important that you bolster your defences when endeavouring to deploy Literal Details.
Build your familiarity with the Standing up Against Authority Strategies from Tactical Language to Facing False Ignorance to build a strong defence for protecting your active manoeuvres.
If somebody challenges you on your Literal Details, it is of the utmost importance that you refuse to allow yourself to be pushed back into playing along with any false realities.
Defend yourself against any hostility by depending on the Counteracting Bad Faith, Facing Gaslighting and Facing False Ignorance strategies. If necessary, deploy Building a Platform to explain your Literal Details in the context of a defensible claim on reality.
Remember that it is almost always better to tolerate being accused of being crazy or of lying, than to have to give up on free speech and your right to publicly express true reality! The above strategies will ensure that even when facing bad faith tactics, you will be able neutralise the attacks without losing any ground.
Deploying Literal Details is one of the best strategies for proactively pushing the boundary when it comes to opening channels of literal communication. This is true both in your personal life and in the wider environment around you.
These open literal expressions of project information are highly effective and extremely powerful when it comes to blasting ever more holes in the wall of silence.
The more people who refuse to follow a rule, the sooner it ceases to be a rule for anyone at all.
The idea that you can only talk about the project, the driver network, and the simulations system in code and metaphor is a rule that we can—and must—continue to shoot to pieces.
When communicating tactically, remember that Literal Details are one of the most powerful tools at your command.
The Less Dance, More You strategy for breaking character during Mandatory Reality is the perfect companion strategy to Literal Details.
As you use Literal Details more and more often, eventually you will find yourself in a position where you can speak openly and literally about the project in detail and at length.
As long as the other party is on your side and chooses not to challenge you, you will have successfully broken through the wall of silence.
Put Literal Details to work for you in your life as often as you can and the results will be transformative.
Less Dance, More You
Every time you assume the role of a false character for Mandatory Reality, you are actively participating in building the false reality that we are trying to escape from.
Every time you play along with a simulation, whether symbolically and through code, or by acting it out in material reality, you are actively contributing to the Simulations System and are likely to be utilised in the process of inflicting real delusions on the people around you.
While the best thing you could do to make a positive difference in this world would be to refuse to act out any false characters at all, if you are in a position where you are performing a false identity in a scripted controlled event, you must do everything you can to minimise and counteract the harms of those behaviours.
Less Dance, More You means applying the absolute minimum effort to acting the false identity, while at the same time doing everything you can to express the real you from behind the mask, as well as the actual reality of the world around you—as literally, truthfully, and openly as you can.
To engage in Less Dance, More You:
- Avoid doing anything that might delude the people around you. While you may think ticking boxes and playing the role just to get your obligations out of the way might be the easiest approach, if those behaviours are potentially contributing to deluding those around you, you must minimise them at all costs.
- Refuse to play along with any disempowering or intimidating routines. Gaslighting, policing for the project behaviours, or enforcing any other form of intimidation or disempowerment on the people you communicate with is never acceptable. Every time you engage in those behaviours you are doing significant harm to others, as well as making it more difficult for them to escape from the false reality that you are building around them.
- Be yourself. Reject the character profile and the scripted story. Dispense with the false identity as soon as possible and instead use the event to express your true self. Speak from behind the mask and don’t bother trying to make the false role convincing—a convincing performance will only make it harder for others to recognise the actual reality of the situation.
- Use Literal Details. The more you apply the Literal Details strategy, the more you are actively dismantling the disempowering and delusion-based false realities of the Simulations System and Mandatory Reality. Speaking truthfully and literally is the only way you can be sure that the message you are trying to communicate is going to be heard. On the other hand speaking in code through non-reality-based communication actively builds and enforces the prison of false realities.
- Aim to use characters that are as close to the real you as possible. Remember that you can say no to any roles or identities that you have a problem with. Claim the right by speaking openly and rely on conscientious objection and deliberate tactical communication to defend your position.
- Apply Less Dance, More You even if the false identity is very different from the real you. Consider the role as just a mask, a disguise, and a fake voice, while making a deliberate and persistent effort to make everything else about your public presentation and communication the real you.
To summarise, Less Dance, More You involves rejecting the false character and the scripted Mandatory Reality or simulations act, minimising communication through code and metaphor, while expressing more honesty, more authenticity of your true self, and more literal speech grounded in actual reality.
Less Dance, More You means less and less act, more and more truth.
Less Dance, More You and Literal Details are a power combination of strategies that you can use to break through the wall of silence and actively work to open channels of literal communication.
Every time you apply Less Dance, More You and Literal Details during your public Mandatory Reality performances, you will be making a powerful contribution to freeing those around you from the project-enforced false realities that must be actively dismantled to achieve true freedom.
True Belief
When the project is the opposition that you are trying to outmanoeuvre, the following is a fundamental truth:
The enemy already knows all your strategies and secrets—while the people around you don’t.
As long as the wall of silence functions, your friends and allies—as well as your potential allies—can never truly be certain what you know, what you believe, or what you’re working on. And nor can you ever be certain of any of those things about them.
The project knows. But the people don’t.
This is a very big problem for people and the project likes it that way, because it keeps you—and the people around you—trapped on the inside, as well as on the outside.
Having to hide what you believe and keep important information to yourself isolates you from others, prevents open organisation, and forces you to play along with all manner of abusive and unnatural simulated routines.
As long as you can’t ever truthfully express what you believe or what you know, you are stuck policing yourself on the inside while facing a public wall of silence on the outside.
This is why the project tries to enforce an oppressive and authoritarian rule-set against free expression—as well as maintaining a constant circus of simulated excuses for why you have to keep your secrets.
The more you put Standing up to Authority strategies into action, the less power the project’s arbitrary and individually-tailored rules will have over your right to express yourself.
The more you engage the Choosing your Side strategies, the more you can claim an open and authentic identity, and the less you have to hide from simulated interests.
Every driver voice you ever hear on the driver network, every simulated being who communicates with you, is really the same entity that controls the project itself.
The more you acknowledge that there is really no difference between any driver or simulated voice and the true power above the project—the more you acknowledge that these voices already know everything about you—the freer and safer you are in expressing what you really believe.
True Belief involves making little effort to hide your true beliefs, the depth of your knowledge, or your true goals and values from anyone—whether on the driver network, behind-the-scenes, or when out in public.
Since the project already knows everything about you anyway—on the inside and on the outside—and therefore so do its simulated entities—there really is no point in having to hide your most important values and beliefs.
When you claim your True Belief, you are free to show your true self to the world.
When working towards True Belief:
- Choose your side. Work your way out of any deals with simulated entities that may involve pretending to have beliefs that you don’t actually hold. Make your moves as quickly as possible and avoid game-playing. The drivers will try to waste your time with simulated roles and routines, or pointless tasks in actual reality. Call the drivers what they really are, let them know you’re aware the routines are just a cover for abuse, and tell them you won’t play their games any more.
- Admit to your true values and beliefs. Since the project has access to every thought you’ve ever had, it already knows what you believe—and so do its drivers and simulated entities. You might as well stop playing its tedious games and stake your claim on reality, by openly acknowledging what your goals and opinions really are.
- Build your defences. Invest as much time and energy as you need to build confidence and skill with your defensive strategies. Work on Inner-Game, Standing up to Authority, and Facing Reprisals to make sure you can protect your true beliefs from any potential attacks.
- Express yourself more freely and authentically. Take continuous and deliberate effort to embody and express more truth about what you really believe and who you really are. Hide less and less of what you really think—whether through literal communication or with the covert styles of speech—and make constant efforts to test the waters and push your boundary forward, in terms of expressing your true opinions and beliefs.
- Make the most of it. In this world, privacy of information is impossible on the inside, never mind on the outside. The project already knows every detail about you, while at any moment anybody could hear anything about you at all. Since you can’t really hide much anyway, you might as well make the most of it. If they already know, then there’s not much point hiding your true beliefs!
True Belief and Honesty, Authenticity, and Consistency are two complimenting strategies.
The sooner you can reach a state of True Belief, the more liberated, confident, and emotionally healthy you will feel.
Choosing an attitude and a lifestyle based around True Belief will make you perfectly primed for bringing the fight against the project out into the open.
More Fighting for Reality strategies are coming soon!
Clever Communication
As soon as you’re comfortable with the foundations of the prosocial overt approach, it will be time to put your strategies to work in real time, with as many conversation partners and in as many contexts as you can.
The Clever Communication section offers a selection of quick-fire communication tactics that will support you as you put your gameplan of strategies into action.
Use these tactics in real time, to fend off challenges to your longer-form strategies, as well as to continuously create new opportunities to gain more ground in your fight for free literal speech and actual true reality.
Putting it all Together
Blend your strategies and tactics into a communicative style that will work for you, intuitively and on the move.
The more you build familiarity with the strategies, and the more you practise in action, the more you’ll internalise the prosocial overt and active playbook in a way that will be natural and confident for you.
Your whole skill-set of strategies will be readily available to you, no matter the challenge!
You Don’t Need Permission
Build the certitude that you never need permission to do what you believe is right.
When the time comes to take action, you need only look to yourself when deciding the best way to proceed. Good advice is always welcome, but you are always your own master!
Speak freely as often as possible, and never be dependent on validation or approval from others.
Naked Belief
Be like the Conspiracy Theorist and state your beliefs confidently, no matter how far-fetched they might sound against the backdrop of Mandatory Reality.
You never need validation or approval for your claims on true reality, because you are confident in your own openly-stated beliefs.
Claim your consistent identity as a full conscientious objector to immoral or abusive systemic practises and never deny your open opposition to the system.
Regardless of how openly you stand against the abuses of the system, as a conscious human being you still have an equal right to participate and an equal vote!
Eyes on the Prize
Always have your communication targets in mind:
- Free literal speech.
- Building actual reality.
- Openly claiming your consistent beliefs and true identity.
- Using your voice to bring the secret systems out into the open.
Pursue these objectives relentlessly.
Waffle and Deflect
Use your voice to dominate the direction of the conversation to neutralise the potential for challenge.
Long-winded, meandering, and neutral-sounding “waffling” can be a great way to steer you away from danger.
Adopt a friendly and uncontroversial “we’re all friends here” -style attitude to disarm the potential for hostility.
The more you control the tone and direction of the narrative, the less the opposition can challenge you.
Never Let Anything Stick to You
Be deflective, fluid, and savvy as you blend the strategies and styles together.
Always keep some of your focus on using your communication to outmanoeuvre any bad faith tactics from the opposition.
Keep an eye out for potential dangers, and neutralise them before they have a chance to begin.
Perfect Deflection
As described in Literal Details.
When facing a challenge to the validity of your claims on actual reality, use true but neutral-sounding language to calmly explain your claim.
Instead of lying or trying to speak in code to cover yourself, maintain strategic ecology by working to make sure your evasive language tactics are always still grounded in the actual truth.
Waffle and meander as much as possible to defuse the opposition, but make sure your own words never work against your efforts to bring true literal reality out into the open!
Constant Recalibration
Constantly update your communication styles and strategies based on the behaviours of your conversation partner.
Moderate your attitude and tone in a way that works best with whoever you’re speaking with.
Choose your styles and tactics based on the person in front of you!
One Step Back, Two Steps Forward
Any time you’re forced to give up any ground, you should consider it an unacceptable loss. Be determined to make up for it as soon as you can.
If you get momentarily pushed back, wait for an opportunity to counterstrike again and then push forward even harder.
Always aim to gain more ground.
Don’t Back Down, Re-Target
When you can’t get one target, scan for another.
The moment things are safe again after a challenge, use your communication to take another shot at the false realities of Mandatory Reality and the simulations system.
As soon as you see an opening, assert actual reality and your right to free literal speech.
The targets are everywhere and every shot counts!
The Mind-Blank Pause
If the drivers blank your mind, pause for a moment to regather your thoughts and then determinedly push forward.
No Concessions
Be uncompromising in the fight for reality. Offer the opposition nothing.
Every Chance you Get
Make use of every opportunity available to hit the wall of silence and build true reality around you. Every moment, every interaction, has value.
Never let them force the bubble of mundane Mandatory Reality onto you.
Be relentless as you blast your way through the wall of silence and claim your right to assert actual true reality, openly and literally!
The Strategies of Open Resistance Part One
The Strategies of Open Resistance Part Two
Truth, Freedom, and Reality 