The style of this article is positive and literal. If it seems otherwise, it’s because of driver interference.

Watch out for unnatural valences and unintended tones. Focus as much as possible on absorbing the literal details of the information presented. You can always return to the words later if the drivers are making it difficult.

---

This article is an excerpt from Breaking the Rules Overtly: The Strategies of Overt Resistance – Building the Right Behaviours

One of the most important patterns in how the system in control of our world functions is this:

• If you do the right things, the right way, and for the right reasons, you are far more likely to succeed in achieving positive outcomes.

Importantly, this would be true in a natural environment anyway. Such an approach would definitely make positive outcomes much more likely.

Indeed, when you follow this approach in our world, positive outcomes are far more likely, regardless of how the system chooses to control things.

But there is also a discernable pattern—in the true system that controls both the project and the world around us—that can be reasonably expected to bolster these methods, as well as to support the positive outcomes that will occur for natural cause-and-effect reasons anyway.

This Prosocial Pattern tends to assist The Right Approach.

The Right Approach is:

• Doing the right things
• The right way
• For the right reasons.

You are using The Right Approach:

• If your motivations are truly for helping people—both those around you, as well as yourself—without hurting anyone, then you are doing things for the right reasons.
• If your behaviours are healthy, sane, and productive—if they constructively work towards what you are trying to achieve by taking action in reality—then you are doing things the right way.
• If the things you are working on will actually have a positive beneficial outcome in the real world, without causing any harm to anyone, then you are doing the right things.

As such, choosing The Right Approach always involves considering:

• Why you are doing things. The right reasons should always be prosocial, or at least ethically neutral.
• How you are doing things. The right way should be constructive,
  ethical or ethically neutral, and predictably likely to lead to your goals in actual reality.
• What things you are doing. The right things should have the desired positive effect in the world—whether for you, the people around you, or society itself—without causing any harm.

Always remember the Why, How, and What of The Right Approach.

Make sure the Why, How, and What of your strategies, behaviours, and planning for project routines are as ethical, ecological, and constructive as possible.

If your Right Approach follows these guidelines it is reasonably likely to trigger The Prosocial Pattern in the true system of control that governs our world—at least on average and over time.

That said, The Prosocial Pattern in the system is not something you should ever trust or rely on.

As with all of the mechanisms and systems encompassed in the true system of control—including the Antisocial Mechanism, the driver network, and the simulations system—you must never try to game it.

Avoid engaging in efforts to manipulate, outsmart, or control The Prosocial Pattern, because those efforts will backfire!

Always remember:

• When you try to game the system, the system games you. Usually your efforts will end up working against you, or cause other serious unintended consequences.
• The only way to win is not to play.

Nonetheless, over time and on average, this pattern can be expected and should be factored into your planning.

When considering how to factor The Prosocial Pattern into your plans:

• Keep it in mind, but don’t devote too much of your time and attention to it.
• Instead, focus on the value that will arise naturally through using The Right Approach-style strategies. When compared to The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways, The Right Approach will create so many cause-and-effect positives in actual reality—while avoiding so many of the common harms involved in the wrong methods—that success is much more likely anyway.
• Remember The Prosocial Pattern is extremely dependent on what everybody is doing in a situation, not just you. If everyone else is doing things in counterproductive or unethical ways, then it may not make much difference for your goals in any particular situation or event.
• Consider The Prosocial Pattern when making calculated risks. Factor it into your decision-making when you weigh up your odds of success. Taking chances, standing up to authority, and calling bluffs may be more likely to succeed, but success is never guaranteed.
• Never expect to succeed solely because of The Prosocial Pattern. It may help you, but you can never depend on it to save the day. Even when you do everything right, things can and do still go wrong. Rely instead on cause-and-effect strategies that will have a predictably ethical and ecological outcome regardless of The Prosocial Pattern.

In this world, you will have to endeavour to do the right things, the right ways, regardless of any mechanisms or higher functions in the system that may or may not be helping you.

Avoid trying to game the pattern at all costs and remember this is also true for other systemic functions such as The Antisocial Mechanism too!

Remember:

• Gaming the Antisocial Mechanism created the Suffering Economy. While trying to game The Prosocial Pattern probably wouldn’t lead to anything even nearly as bad, the outcome would still definitely be a bad one.

Regarding The Prosocial Pattern and the behaviour of others:

• The pattern is dependent both on your behaviour and the behaviour of those around you.
• If you are doing the right things the right way for the right reasons, even the events most obviously controlled by the system are more likely to lead to better outcomes.
• If many more people around you are doing the right things the right way for the right reasons, better outcomes are much more likely.
• If most people around you are doing the wrong things the wrong way, or for the wrong reasons, then success will probably not be all that likely at all—though things will still work out better for everyone when you’re using The Right Approach.

Doing the right things the right way for the right reasons—ethically, honestly, and constructively—makes success far more likely. The Prosocial Pattern can be subtle and should never be depended on, but the right strategies and behaviours will always be effective, no matter what else is going on in the system.

As such, The Right Approach will have positive cause-and-effect results, for rational and predictable reasons in actual reality—while also making The Prosocial Pattern more likely to emerge in the background.

Watch out for drivers or the project trying to use the Prosocial Pattern as an excuse for enacting the Antisocial Mechanism.

Remember:

• Punishing people for not living up to the Prosocial Pattern is neither acceptable nor prosocial. That is just an excuse for hurting you!
• Taking away people’s power or freedom by trying to make them work for the Prosocial Pattern is neither acceptable nor prosocial. That is just an excuse for controlling you!

Never validate or accept the Antisocial Mechanism, no matter what form it manifests itself in!

Remember that The Right Approach stands in direct contradiction of The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways.

It is impossible to truly do something using The Right Approach if it involves using The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways.

The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways include:

• Speaking primarily in code and metaphor.
• Denying true reality.
• Using fake identities and disguises.
• Pretending to be against your own interests.
• Playing both sides of an issue.
• Playing along with hurtful behaviours.
• Lying to, manipulating, or deceiving people.
• Policing each other for the project.
• Following orders that are obviously abusive or are likely to lead to abusive outcomes.
• Giving up control of your body, voice, or behaviour to drivers.
• Participating in routines based on surveillance.
• Participating in routines based on mind control or enforced reconditioning.
• Participating in routines based on social testing or experimentation without consent.

That said, you can use The Right Approach to confront The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways.

For example, a Right Approach strategy of conscientious objection against policing each other for the project would involve:

• The Right Thing: Refusing to engage in any of the policing for the project behaviours and refusing to participate in any routines intended to police others or yourself. The policing for the project behaviours include: Threatening and intimidating words and behaviours; Disempowerment tactics such as Gaslighting; Forcing others to follow project rules; etc.
• The Right Way: Using civil, respectful language to explain why you are morally opposed to the behaviours and routines and using defensive overt resistance strategies to protect yourself from challenge or attack.
• The Right Reason: Because the policing for the project behaviours directly contribute to enslaving people in the project system.

For now, the only truly necessary Wrong Things and Wrong Ways are:

• Speaking in code and metaphor.
• Denying true reality.
• Using fake identities and disguises.
• Lying to people.

Relying on those methods—and no others from the Wrong Things and Wrong Ways list—will ensure that your strategies and routines are as close to The Right Approach as currently possible.

• But only if your strategies are also directly targeted at eliminating what is harmful about those methods entirely!

For example, the Less Dance, More You strategy for breaking character during project routines, involves:

• The Right Thing: Expressing your true self and speaking literally about reality, rather than playing along with the fake identity or the public routine.
• The Right Way: Using disguises and cover stories only for as long as it takes to reach the opportunity to fully break character and then taking deliberate action to literally express the truth of your identity and the actual reality of the situation around you.
• The Right Reason: Because the performative acts and routines of Mandatory Reality directly contribute to keeping everyone trapped in a false public world.

In the above example, you have had to rely on using disguises and the denial of reality for project routines in order to reach the opportunity to use Less Dance, More You to break character and literally express your true self and actual reality.

Since the main constructive efforts of your strategy—breaking character and expressing the literal truth—involve significant overt efforts to fight against the harms of the wrong methods, you can consider the above strategy to be as functionally close to The Right Approach as possible.

Ideally, any other strategy you apply that involves the use of false identities and performative project routines should also apply Less Dance, More You to neutralise those harms, before it could be considered The Right Approach.

Do everything you can to put The Right Approach into action every time you plan your behaviours, face your challenges, and interact with the project.

You will be far more likely to succeed!