The style of this article is positive and literal. If it seems otherwise, it’s because of driver interference.

Watch out for unnatural valences and unintended tones. Focus as much as possible on absorbing the literal details of the information presented. You can always return to the words later if the drivers are making it difficult.

---

This article is an expanded excerpt from Breaking the Rules Overtly: The Strategies of Overt Resistance – Building the Right Behaviours

Click here to skip ahead to The Wrong Things and Wrong Ways in more detail

Most of the project-taught tactics and techniques involve doing the wrong things the wrong ways.

Even when you are doing things for the right reasons—even when you are trying to do the right things—you are almost always destined to fail when using the project-taught methods for confronting challenges and setting up project routines.

If you’re not sure if these approaches are ever successful or not, ask yourself:

• How often do you actually get the outcomes you wanted or expected when you apply the project-taught methods?
• Are we ever really winning, when it involves that much suffering and madness?

One of the reasons these behaviours and routines are so disastrous is because the project way of doing things is so extremely bad for everyone!

The project as a real system and institution functioning in actual reality is predicated on hurting, deluding, and controlling people. When you follow project orders and let the drivers make the plans, you are directly contributing, in a real cause-and-effect way, to those outcomes.

When you are doing what the project tells you to, when you are using the self-defeating methods the project has taught you, you can be certain that you are contributing to the project’s worst prime directives.

The project’s worst prime directives are:

• Deluding people.
• Exploiting people.
• Abusing people.
• Controlling people.
• Subjugating people.

These directives are present at all times in practically every effort the project puts into action, both big and small.

This includes:

• The public staging of Mandatory Reality.
• The standard practices the project teaches you for acting and behaving in Mandatory Reality.
• The simulations system (i.e. the system of Central, its shell worlds, and bubble realities) and how you have been taught to interact with it.
• The driver network, how you have been taught to interact with it, and how the drivers interact with you.
• The underground network and the tactics and techniques it has taught you for fighting the project itself.

Every single one of The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways contributes directly—with a predictable cause-and-effect in actual reality—to all or most of the project’s directives based around abuse, control, exploitation, subjugation, and the conditioning of delusions.

The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways include:

• Speaking primarily in code and metaphor.
• Denying true reality.
• Using fake identities and disguises.
• Pretending to be against your own interests.
• Playing both sides of an issue.
• Playing along with hurtful behaviours.
• Lying to, manipulating, or deceiving people.
• Policing each other for the project.
• Following orders that are obviously abusive or are likely to lead to abusive outcomes.
• Giving up control of your body, voice, or behaviour to drivers.
• Participating in routines based on surveillance.
• Participating in routines based on mind control or enforced reconditioning.
• Participating in routines based on social testing or experimentation without consent.

To understand why these behaviours and actions are so harmful, it is necessary to consider each individually.

Since all of these behaviours are so unethical and so damaging, they cause multiple forms of harm both to the individuals involved and to society itself. While at the same time, each of them contributes directly to the oppressive project system and most or all of its worst prime directives.

The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways in more detail

Speaking primarily in code and metaphor

Your surface-level communication matters.

If what you are saying on the surface validates the false world of Mandatory Reality (if it pretends that the false world is true) then you are contributing to prolonging the false reality around you every time you speak—no matter what else you might be trying to say with code.

Further to this, when you speak in code and metaphor, your communication is entirely dependent on the drivers to share the meaning with others. Very often, they share the wrong meaning, an abusive meaning, or no meaning at all.

This creates an extremely unreliable communicative environment, where most of the time nobody is ever certain what anyone around them is really trying to say, or what anyone else actually knows or believes.

Devoting your time and energy to trying to communicate with code—instead of taking efforts to utilise true, open, and literal speech—directly contributes to the oppressive restrictions on our right and ability to speak freely in public.

A voice can either be used for building the wall of silence, or facilitating open channels of literal communication.

A voice can either be used for building false realities, or actual reality.

You must apply your cause-and-effect actions to building actual reality as much as you can. Using open and literal speech is the necessary way to do this.

Denying true reality

Playing along with Mandatory Reality and pretending to be ignorant of true reality actively contributes to prolonging the false public world that we are trying to dismantle.

Worse than that, it forces other people to play along with your false version of reality, which prevents them from being able to speak openly and freely themselves—since you’ll pretend you don’t even know what they’re talking about.

Even when those people take efforts to explain, by bringing the basic facts of true reality into the open, most of the conversation is wasted on telling you things that you already know. That time and effort could have been spent on communicating literal and detailed information, which could then be applied to much more constructive endeavours.

Denying true reality creates false realities. It forces the people around you to stay quiet and tolerate a maddening and tedious false world, with no actual basis in our true existence. It isolates people in their own driver-managed bubble realities, without ever allowing them to adequately compare and contrast information with anyone else.

It is impossible to fully confront the challenges and problems of the real world while having to play along with a false world.

As often as possible, endeavour to acknowledge true reality as literally and as openly as you can!

Using fake identities and disguises

While it may be necessary to lie about your identity in this world—at least for the time-being—taking extensive efforts to hide your true identity and act out a false identity causes multiple forms of significant damage, both to you and the people around you.

Remember that one of the worst prime directives of the project—including Mandatory Reality—is to condition people with delusions.

When you put on disguises and act out false roles, whatever else is going on, you are also being used by the project in an ongoing effort to delude as many people as possible.

Masks and disguises are not just neutral tools for public performance, they are the real implements of an extremely dangerous and damaging process—the public conditioning of delusions—which is taking place in our environments all day, every day.

It is extremely damaging for people to have to live in an environment where nobody’s identity is ever for certain, especially while the masks and disguises are routinely used to contribute to the conditioning of delusions.

When people have to rely on wearing prosthetics and disguises for their long-term existence, it is a terrible way of life. It deprives you of being able to claim your true identity and show your real face to the world. It prevents you from being yourself and forces you to play along with a false persona. It denies you your right to use the name you were born with, or your right to a consistent public identity over time.

The uncertainties and fears of living with project-managed identities will be well-known to all of you and are far too many to list here.

You must do everything you can to reduce the level of disguise involved in all project routines and reveal as much of your true self as possible, while speaking as truthfully and literally as you can, regardless of the project routine you’re participating in.

Pretending to be against your own interests

While it may be necessary to lie about your identity in this world—at least for the time-being—taking extensive efforts to hide your true identity and act out a false identity causes multiple forms of significant damage, both to you and the people around you.

Remember that one of the worst prime directives of the project—including Mandatory Reality—is to condition people with delusions.

When you put on disguises and act out false roles, whatever else is going on, you are also being used by the project in an ongoing effort to confuse, delude, and psychologically enslave as many people as possible.

Masks and disguises are not just neutral tools for public performance, they are the real implements of an extremely dangerous and damaging process—the public conditioning of delusions—which is taking place in our environments all day, every day.

It is extremely damaging for people to have to live in an environment where nobody’s identity is ever for certain, especially while the masks and disguises are routinely used to actively delude people.

As for having to rely on wearing prosthetics and disguises for your normal daily existence, it is a terrible way of life. It deprives you of being able to claim your true identity and show your real face to the world. It prevents you from being yourself and forces you to play along with a false persona. It denies you your right to use the name you were born with, or your right to a consistent public identity over time.

The uncertainties and fears of living with project-managed identities will be well-known to all of you and are far too many to list here.

You must do everything you can to reduce the level of disguise involved in all project routines and reveal as much of your true self as possible, while speaking as truthfully and literally as you can, regardless of the project routine you’re participating in.

Playing both sides of an issue

As with pretending to be against your own interests, playing both sides of an issue is a behaviour that actively works against your true goals.

It is impossible to truly play both sides without very soon having to take real cause-and-effect actions that work directly against you or your allies.

The project knows what side you’re really on.

You have been manipulated into playing both sides to keep you trapped in pointless routines, while preventing you from ever being capable of fully working towards what you really want.

You have been weaponised against your own interests and the interests of your own allies every time you agree to do something for the opposition that harms your own interests or your allies.

When it comes to fighting for your rights in actual reality, the opposition knows for certain that you’re against it—so there’s not much point “hiding from the eye”.

Never mind the simulated entities and drivers who claim to be spying on you, they’re really all part of the same singular entity anyway and it already knows everything about you!

You are far better off admitting to your true beliefs and goals, so that you can actually freely work towards them.

Instead of playing both sides, you should be taking cause-and-effect constructive actions towards your real goals—especially in prosocial, ethical, and ecological ways.

Playing along with hurtful behaviours

Playing along with hurtful behaviours is one of the drivers’ favourite platforms for making real hurt happen.

While they may tell you that what you’re engaging in is not that hurtful—or manipulate your perceptions so it doesn’t seem too bad to you until it’s too late—often the cause-and-effect results of the actual behaviours are far more hurtful than you might have expected.

Even when the “pretend” hurtful behaviours are not that bad, with driver interference, the offensive and hurtful elements of the behaviour can be amplified to the point where they regularly cause significant harm to the victims.

It is also very common for drivers to make people believe that the other party really is trying to deliberately hurt them when they engage in “pretend” hurtful behaviours.

“Pretend” hurtful behaviours regularly result in all manner of conflicts and psychological or emotional damage for all of the people involved.

You must avoid trying to game the system with “pretend” hurtful behaviours at all times. When you try to game the system, especially with unethical behaviours, the only one really getting gamed is you.

The hurts that result from “pretend” hurtful behaviours are regularly hurtful or offensive for real, and often enough they can actually be extremely damaging to their victims, as well as to the people who engage in them.

Refuse to play along with hurtful behaviours and declare yourself a conscientious objector to hurtful behaviours—including “pretend” hurtful behaviours—entirely!

Lying to, manipulating, or deceiving people

Everybody knows that it is immoral to lie to people or to manipulate them.

Lying to someone takes away their power to perceive the truth as it really is—as well as their ability to make the right subsequent choices—while also involving the danger of significantly deluding them in more serious ways.

Manipulating someone deprives them of their right to freely and deliberately choose their own behaviours and actions for themselves—based on what they themselves want, in accordance with their own values and goals, rather than on what the parties manipulating them have decided for them.

Lies, deception, and manipulation are a direct violation of your fundamental needs and rights as a human being. Everybody has a right to the truth and actual reality. Everybody has a right to make their own free and informed decisions, free from manipulation.

Nobody likes being lied to or manipulated!

Basing a whole way of life on lies and manipulation creates an extremely harmful environment for the people who are forced to live that way—a world where nobody’s needs or rights are ever fully respected and personal choice is routinely suffocated.

You must make serious efforts to communicate and behave more truthfully, literally, and authentically. Avoid deceiving or manipulating anyone!

Policing each other for the project

Policing each other for the project is one of the most oppressive and self-defeating behaviours you have been taught to engage in.

The problem is that policing each other for the project and “pretending” to police each other for the project are effectively the same thing.

Always remember:

• If your behaviour is predictably likely to prevent someone else from being able to speak freely, or from otherwise breaking the project rules, then you are policing them for the project.

As with all of the “pretend” behaviours, if you try to only pretend to engage in the behaviour of policing others for the project, as long as your actual behaviours in reality will have the same effect, then you are policing them for real.

As with all of the “pretend” behaviours, as soon as the drivers start interfering with the perceptions and senses of the people involved, the situation can become much more difficult and very bad things do happen.

Common forms of policing each other for the project include:

• Intimidating or aggressive attitudes and behaviours while representing—or “pretending” to represent—the project’s interests.
• Any disempowerment tactics designed to force people into playing along with a disempowering false reality. For example: Gaslighting; Victim-Blaming; Pressuring people into unnecessary doctor appointments or other pointless labours; etc.
• Denying actual reality.
• Making false accusations.
• Playing the bad side and representing the project’s abusive goals and intentions.
• Telling other people to follow harmful or unethical project rules, or that they have no choice but to participate in harmful or unethical project routines.

The policing behaviours listed above have a direct cause-and-effect on:

• Making people too afraid to speak up.
• Making people too afraid to break the rules or step out of line.
• Forcing people to play along with a false reality.
• Making people feel disempowered.
• Making people repressed.
• Preventing people from being capable of communicating with each other in an open and literal way.

Remember that policing each other for the project and “pretending” to police each other for the project are effectively the same thing, because the cause-and-effect behaviours have the same expected result.

You must do everything in your power to stop policing each other for the project!

Following orders that are obviously abusive or are likely to lead to abusive outcomes

“I was just following orders” is not a valid excuse for anything, especially not when the behaviours involved are obviously abusive or are clearly likely to lead to abusive outcomes.

The problem with following orders that are obviously abusive is simple:

• What the project is telling you to do is obviously abusive!

If they told you to slap a child for a project routine, you would refuse. It is highly likely that the project authorities would back down to your moral position. Even if they didn’t, you would be willing to fight for your position without giving in to the abusive orders.

Chances are you’ve done this with project orders and directives that you considered too objectionable to agree to multiple times over the course of your life.

Ask yourself if you can recall any examples where you refused to do something because it was so bad—without offering anything else in exchange—and the drivers or project authorities did indeed back down to your moral position.

That is proof in actual reality that you are capable of conscientiously objecting to project orders that you consider too morally wrong to obey.

It is proof that you are capable of standing up for your right to conscientiously object to anything you consider too morally wrong to engage in.

It is proof that the project authorities do often back down when you refuse to follow orders for the right reasons—especially when you do so based on a strong moral foundation.

It is strong evidence that you will be successful if you conscientiously object to participating in abusive project routines in future.

Which routines you prioritise when you conscientiously object to following abusive project orders is up to you, but if you ever want to be free you will have to eventually object to them all.

Giving up control of your body, voice, or behaviour to drivers

Giving up control of your body, voice, or behaviour to drivers is really, really bad for you, as well as those around you.

When participating in these routines, the words the drivers make people say are often highly offensive, disturbing, and abusive.

Obscenities and sexually offensive remarks are common, as well as information that transgresses the boundaries, and the right to privacy, of both the person being made to speak and the other people around them.

When people agree to these routines, it allows the drivers to pollute the public environment with highly unnatural speech and behaviours, which is extremely bad for the psychological well-being of everyone present, especially the person under driver control.

Often, the drivers force people to speak in nonsensical spiels, delivered in strange accents and bizarre tones during these events. At the same time, they inflict altered states on the person under control to the point where it is impossible for them to even attempt to monitor or regulate their own behaviour.

Essentially, during these routines, you are completely at the mercy of the drivers and they do not treat you well!

Even when the words and speech seem more natural and neutral, as long as you are repeating whatever the drivers tell you to say, things can and often do turn bad. At any moment the drivers can make you say things that are bothersome or offensive to you and those around you. While the entire process itself is irrational, unnatural, and disempowering for all of the people involved.

These routines are a serious violation of your rights of body and mind. Your voice and your body is yours and no other entity has the right to ever take control of it.

When the drivers try to, ideally you should be fighting them every step of the way.

You must refuse to participate in these routines ever again.

You will have to strongly conscientiously object to this practise and take significant efforts to teach those around you, as well as any dependents, to do the same.

Participating in routines based on surveillance

You’re not really spying on anybody when you participate in surveillance-based project routines.

The main events that are occurring are that the drivers are wasting your time and energy, making you suffer tedious labours and uncomfortable experiences, while transgressing the boundaries and right to privacy of whoever you’re supposed to be spying on, and your own boundaries and rights as well.

While the information you are exposed to during these routines may or may not have any basis in reality, often these routines do involve the sharing of private and personal information which you most likely neither want to hear, nor have any right to hear.

Routines based around infringing each other’s right to privacy are extremely unhealthy for all parties involved. Surveillance-based routines make it very difficult for people to maintain even the healthy conception of personal and private boundaries, never mind actually putting them into practise!

Always remember you do not have a right to any private or personal information concerning anybody other than yourself.

The moment the drivers try to share private or personal information with you about anyone, tell them it’s not your business and you don’t want to know!

You must conscientiously object to participating in all surveillance-based project routines immediately.

Participating in routines based on mind control or enforced reconditioning

There is no acceptable use for mind control.

Taking control of somebody else’s mind and controlling their behaviour is such an extreme violation of that person’s rights of body and mind, and makes them so vulnerable to abuse, that it is never an acceptable practise under any conditions.

While the drivers may try to make you complicit in the control of somebody else’s thoughts or behaviours, what is actually happening is that the drivers are controlling you, at the same time as the other person is being controlled. At most, you are being manipulated into thinking your interactions on the driver network are having an effect on the other person’s behaviour.

Nonetheless, since mind control is such an extreme violation of the other person’s rights and boundaries, you should never have any involvement with such processes at all.

You do not ever have a right to manage or control somebody else’s life and nor does anybody else have a right to manage or control yours.

You should refuse to participate in anything involving the control of somebody else’s thoughts, decisions, behaviours, or interactions at all times.

Enforced reconditioning—forcing routines on a person based around changing their personality or their behaviours without their consent—is something else that is unacceptable under any circumstances.

Even “pretend” project routines based on enforced reconditioning share enough of the same abusive cause-and-effect behaviours to cause significant harm to the people who are forced to tolerate these routines.

Any time you participate in a project routine based on manipulating or deceiving somebody into changing their personality or behaviour—any time you participate in managing and deciding the progression of their life events without their knowledge or consent—you are also participating in enforced reconditioning.

Enforced reconditioning—as well as “pretend” enforced reconditioning—is also something that you should never agree to participate in for serious moral reasons!

Participating in routines based on social testing or experimentation without consent

Manipulating anybody into an event without their consent is inherently wrong.

When the event in question involves project routines based on social testing or experimentation you have transgressed that person’s rights and boundaries even further.

You have also forced them unknowingly into a situation where they may be subjected to unpleasant or harmful experiences that they are not expecting and are not adequately prepared for dealing with.

If the other person hasn’t been informed and they haven’t agreed, then you should not ever set up these events for anyone.

The project is always looking for excuses to abuse people and there are a number of further opportunities involved in these abusive social testing routines for the project to apply its methods of subjugation on the primary victims.

As with many other project routines, Gaslighting, Victim-Blaming, False Accusations, and other deliberate disempowerment techniques are common during these events.

Drivers often use the excuse of psychological or behavioural testing to force extremely uncomfortable physiological and emotional experiences on the victims. You must never validate these excuses ever!

Refusing to set up or go along with these routines will significantly limit the opportunities for these sensory attacks.

These routines can be extremely challenging and unpleasant for their victims, even when the other parties involved think they’re only “pretending”.

Remember that the real behaviours and the “pretend” behaviours often have the exact same cause-and-effect results.

Never agree to any project routines based on social testing or experimentation, especially when the other party has neither been informed nor agreed!

Final Words:

Always remember the project’s worst prime directives.

They are among the fundamental reasons the project—as well as its underground network—has taught you to apply The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways to so many different situations.

As such, using The Wrong Things and the Wrong Ways for any task always contributes to most or all of the following:

• Deluding people.
• Exploiting people.
• Abusing people.
• Controlling people.
• Subjugating people.

As a result of this, The Wrong Things and the Wrong Ways are:

• Abusive.
• Controlling.
• Irrational.
• Antisocial
• Deceptive.
• Disempowering (for you or others).
• Self-defeating.

Trying to apply The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways to make positive changes happen in your environment is an endeavour that is destined to fail.

As long as you use The Wrong Things and The Wrong Ways for anything, you are actively working—with a true cause-and-effect in actual reality—to keep yourself and those around you trapped in the system.

The problem is not what you are trying to achieve—or your reasons for achieving it—the problem is that the project-taught methods are primarily designed to abuse people and keep them trapped in the project system, while doing little to assist you in your actual goals.

Using The Wrong Things and the Wrong Ways for any endeavour, whether your intentions are good or bad, will always have the same following results:

• You are unlikely to get what you actually want.
• You and the people around you will suffer.
• You will have taken active efforts to keep yourself trapped in the system.
• You will have taken active efforts to keep the people around you trapped in the system.

There are both rational and predictable cause-and-effect reasons on the ground for this, as well as likely outcomes based on patterns in the wider system of control.

When it comes to openly conscientiously objecting to the Wrong Things and the Wrong Ways list of project-taught behaviours, you will have to pick your battles in terms of what you target first.

Begin with the worst and most harmful project methods. They are all extremely harmful behaviours, but some of them are much worse than others.

The most harmful and most self-defeating include:

• Pretending to be against your own interests.
• Playing along with hurtful behaviours.
• Manipulating people.
• Playing both sides of a really important issue.
• Policing each other for the project.
• Following orders that are obviously abusive or are likely to lead to abusive outcomes.
• Giving up control of your body, voice, or behaviour to drivers.
• Participating in routines based on surveillance.
• Participating in routines based on mind control or enforced reconditioning.
• Participating in routines based on social testing or experimentation without consent.

The only methods on the list that are actually truly necessary for survival in this world are:

• Speaking in code and metaphor.
• Denying true reality.
• Using fake identities and disguises.
• Lying to people.

That is because the above are unavoidable until the false public world of Mandatory Reality has been dismantled completely—and they are still extremely harmful behaviours.

Everything else on the list should be conscientiously objected to starting immediately!

The sooner you conscientiously object to all of the list, the sooner life will improve for everyone. There are other options available for facing your challenges and reaching your goals, without using The Wrong things and The Wrong Ways.

When the time comes to set up project routines and confront your daily challenges, endeavour to build your strategies as close to The Right Approach as you can.

When coming up with routines, check your plans and strategies against the list of Wrong Things and Wrong Ways. The more of the wrong methods involved, the more you are contributing to hurting and subjugating you and the people around you—and the more likely things will go seriously wrong.

Endeavour to come up with new plans and strategies based as closely as possible on The Right Approach. Endeavour to make your plans and strategies as honest, prosocial, ethical, and ecological as possible.

The Right Approach and the Prosocial Pattern